Tech
The All-New Apple Ginza opens in Tokyo
Apple CEO Tim Cook at the Apple Ginza store reopening on September 26, 2025, in Tokyo, Japan (Christopher Jue/Getty Images)
Slicing the Pie

The best analyst questions from Apple’s earnings call

Apple even answered some of them!

Rani Molla

By most accounts, Apple had a very good fourth quarter, posting record revenue and profit and beating analysts’ expectations. Apple certainly thought the quarter went well.

Here’s our count of some of the superlatives bandied about, mostly by Apple executives, on the earnings call:

  • “Best” 11x

  • “All-time” 24x

  • “Ever” 10x

  • “Record” 39x

The quarter that ended in September was indeed very good, with iPhone sales growing 6% from a year earlier — a number the company said would be higher if not for supply constraints — and revenue from its Services division reaching an all-time high. And Apple’s guidance for its all-important holiday quarter is predicting the highest iPhone and total revenue ever.

Of course, Apple’s executives, including its unflappable and very media savvy CEO, Tim Cook, are always touting records, even in less superlative quarters. Part of that has to do with the fact that so many people are already locked in to Apple’s walled garden of products and services that it’s tough for Apple revenue not to grow. That’s especially the case amid a natural upgrade cycle, when the phones and other devices people bought en masse around the pandemic are finally crapping out and are in need of an upgrade.

That makes the analyst portion of the earnings call more illuminating, as they asked the knottier questions to help sniff out what’s luck or lock-in versus true business acumen — lest investors think Apple earnings reports are all puppies and rainbows.

Here’s an edited selection of our favorite questions from Thursday’s earnings call — some of which Apple even answered!

Question (Erik Woodring, Morgan Stanley): Why is the iPhone 17 having the degree of success that it is at this point? Is it the installed base replacement cycle kicking in or are there specific features or functionality consumers are buying it for?

Answer (Apple CEO Tim Cook): I think it’s all about the product. The product lineup is incredibly strong, our strongest ever. The 17 Pro is the most Pro phone we’ve ever done. The iPhone Air feels so thin and so light in your hand, it feels like it’s going to fly away. And then the 17 phone is an incredible value and takes several of the features that were reserved for Pro before and brings them down to the consumer lineup. So, overall, strongest iPhone lineup ever, and it’s resonating around the world.

Question (Michael Ng, Goldman Sachs): What portion of demand is coming from upgraders (people who already have iPhones) versus switchers (people who have Androids)?

Answer (Cook): We did set a September quarter record for upgraders, and so it was a great quarter from that point of view. It’s really too early in the cycle on 17 to make any comments about upgraders or switchers.

Question (Ng): What drove the higher Services revenue growth?

Answer (Apple CFO Kevan Parekh): I think that the way we look at it is, it’s not one thing to point to that would’ve driven this higher performance. Our Services portfolio is very broad, with a broad range of businesses, all that have different growth profiles and different performance characteristics. So those can vary in a given quarter.

Question (Ben Reitzes, Melius Research): Was Services revenue, which includes total acquisition cost (TAC) payments from Google, impacted by the resolution of the Google monopoly trial ruling?

Answer (Parekh): There was no TAC-related impact. What I would say is our strong performance for the quarter is really organically driven.

Question (Krish Sankar, TD Cowen): What’s contributing to the iPhone supply constraints, and how much business did you leave on the table because of it?

Answer (Cook): To be clear, the constraint was not related to manufacturing capacity per se. It was that we called the number of iPhone 16s that we were going to make and were a bit short of where the demand really was. So we could have sold more. Were not, publicly at least, estimating the extent of that. And then, on iPhone 17 family, the demand is very strong. And so we obviously came out of the Q4 time frame with lots of back orders.

Question (Amit Daryanani, Evercore): What caused the weakness in China sales?

Answer (Cook): The Greater China revenue was down 4% year over year in the September quarter. It was driven by iPhone. And if you look at iPhone, the majority of the sequential year-over-year change was due to supply constraints that I mentioned earlier. And so it was basically supply constraints that drove the results. Were thrilled with what were seeing right now, with traffic being up significantly year over year and the reception of the 17 family. We expect to return to growth this quarter.

Question (Richard Kramer, Arete): Are you seeing evidence that AI capabilities or features are a material purchase consideration for consumers or are the record sales levels youre reporting simply reflecting other factors like the retention of your iOS base?

Answer (Cook): There are many factors that influence peoples purchasing considerations. We dont have a great in-depth survey yet on the current iPhone 17 because its very new in the cycle, and we give it some time to formulate. But I would say that Apple Intelligence is a factor. And were very bullish on it becoming a greater factor.

Question (Kramer): In the wake of nearly every other large tech company massively increasing their capex in advance of AI demand, do you anticipate Apple altering its long-standing hybrid approach to your own and third-party data centers?

Answer (Parekh): We are expecting increases in our capex spending related to AI investments. And we do believe this hybrid model has served us very well, and we continue to want to leverage it.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Tom Jones

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.