World
Stork delivery
Stork delivery (Getty Images)

America’s birth rate keeps dropping

Births in the US, like almost everywhere else, are on the decline

Conceived notion

New provisional data released yesterday by the CDC outlined another drop in US births, as the total fertility rate fell from 1.66 births per woman in 2022 to 1.62 last year — equivalent to about 3.6 million births, less than any year since 1979, and the lowest rate recorded since tracking began in the 1930s.

America’s fertility rate peaked at ~3.7 births per woman during a baby boom in the late ‘50s so substantial that it became the moniker of an entire generation. It dropped sharply in the 1960s and 70s, before picking back up. In 2007, it reached 2.1 for the last time — the birth rate required for the natural population to replace itself from one generation to the next (theoretically).

And, America’s not alone in its baby bust.

2024-04-26-2-global-fertility-rates-slumping

On a global scale, fertility is falling fast.

The global rate has roughly halved over the past 50 years to ~2.3 births per woman, and it’s a trend that cuts across cultures, language, and incomes. Just this week, the Korea Times reported that births in South Korea, which has the widest gender pay gap of any OECD country, had dropped below 20,000 in February — the first time that threshold had been breached, despite its government spending ~$280bn on child-rearing incentives. In Italy, there are now 12 deaths for every 7 births in the nation. The population of China, once-famed for its one-child policy, is now also shrinking.

Although throwing money at a fertility shortfall might temper the trend in the short term, it fails to address some of the longer-term factors. Unequal labor divides within households, the rising cost of raising a child, increasing access to contraception, economic insecurity, lowering male fertility rates, and a desire to delay starting a family have all been posited as reasons for the declines.

Related reading: Teen birth rates plunge 78% since peaking in 1991.

More World

See all World
world

Google searches for “roman numerals” hit a new peak this Super Bowl

Following on from last year’s Super Bowl LIX, and Super Bowl LVIII before that, you’d be forgiven for thinking that the title “Super Bowl LX” might have created less confusion than previous iterations.

But it seems that the archaic notation denoting this year’s Big Game was no exception: monthly search volumes for “roman numerals” in the US were at the highest volume seen in over two decades this February, according to Google Trends data.

Roman numerals super bowl
Sherwood News

If people in shoulder pads throwing around a weirdly shaped ball is your Roman Empire, one thing you have to know is Roman numerals — or join the millions who turn to Google to work out how to read them every Super Bowl season.

Ironically, according to the NFL, the numbering system was adopted for clarity, as the game is played at the start of the year “following a chronologically recorded season.” And so, over its 60-year history, the NFL has labeled almost every Super Bowl with a selection of capital letters like X’s, I’s, and V’s — one of the rare exceptions being Super Bowl 50 in 2016, when the NFL ad designers felt Super Bowl L was too unmarketable.

At least stumped football fans in 2026 will be faring much better than those in the year 12,965 would be, who’d have to refer to the Big Game as Super Bowl (breathes in) MMMMMMMMMMDCCCCLXXXXVIIII.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.