Business
Chocolate Chip

Chocolate chip cookies explain the big divide within American consumers

The six-week extravaganza that was earnings season is pretty much done and dusted. But Costco’s results today leave us with some deep thoughts about how chocolate chip cookie consumption explains the current state of American household spending.

The club store giant beat on the top and the bottom lines, saying that the slowdown in inflation has left its clientele willing to open their wallets a bit wider.

“Our members are returning to purchasing more discretionary items and growth in the category was led by toys, tires, lawn & garden and health and beauty aids,” said Gary Millerchip, the company’s CFO.

The appropriately named Millerchip added this aside: “Within our ancillary businesses, the food court had the strongest quarterly sales with continued success of the Chocolate Chip Cookie that was added to the food court this year.”

This wasn’t the first time chocolate chip cookies were name-checked in quarterly conference calls recently.

Weeks ago snack food giant Mondelez acknowledged lackluster sales of its Chips Ahoy brand, noting that the cookies — sales of which tend to skew toward lower income households — seemed to have hit the limit of price increases these folks were willing to swallow.

“People are much more conscious about price points. The frequency is coming down, particularly with the lower-income consumers. And particularly, the brands that are important for them, like Chips Ahoy!, can see that they're losing some market share to private label,” said Dirk Van de Put, CEO of Mondelez.

What does this tale of two cookies tell us? Well, for one thing it suggests that more affluent Americans — Costco members are relatively well off — are doing pretty dang well. Well enough to splurge slightly. The 750-calorie Costco cookie costs $2.49.

At the same time, companies whose traditional customers are not as well off are going to have to face reality. They raised prices too high, and they have to adjust. And they seem to be, at least according to Mondelez’ CFO Luca Zaramella.

“I think we are moving a little bit the price point of Chips Ahoy! and that would allow us to recuperate share and volume. And Chips Ahoy! is the number one driver of the volume declines that you see in the North American segment,” he said. “Then we will have to see how elasticity plays.”

As we’ve mentioned before, average American consumers seem to have hit a wall with prices, especially when it comes to food. Corporate America seems to be taking note and adjusting. Which all seems sort of healthy...unlike chocolate chip cookies.

More Business

See all Business
business
Tom Jones

Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO and founder, was also an early Anthropic investor

A chess prodigy and an actual a knight of the realm in the UK, it’s perhaps no surprise that Demis Hassabis has made some strategic moves about his exposure to AI upside. According to people familiar with the matter, the influential AI architect became an angel investor in Anthropic, currently behind many of the leading AI models, per Arena AI leaderboards.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, per the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spending $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

Im playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as a recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, per the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spending $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

Im playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as a recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

business

Jury rules against Musk in lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman

Jurors in Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and OpenAI found the defendants not liable on all claims on Monday.

In a unanimous verdict reached after less than two hours of deliberation, the Oakland jury found that Musk had waited too long to bring his case forward, exceeding the statute of limitations.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.