Markets
St Louis Battlehawks v Memphis Showboats
The FedEx Cares relay (Wes Hale/Getty Images)
FedExpectations

FedEx’s quarterly report is exactly what you don’t want to see in the upcoming earnings season

FedEx’s results underscore that while tariffs are a solved problem in the eyes of the stock market, they are not for US executives.

Luke Kawa

FedEx’s quarterly report is every fear that could be realized during the second-quarter earnings season rolled into one.

The stock market is a game of “what have you done for me lately?” or, more accurately, “what are you going to do for me in the future?” So when the US shipping giant posted better-than-expected fourth-quarter earnings but an ugly outlook for the three months ending August, shares tumbled (though they’ve pared losses to about 2.6% as of 10:55 a.m. ET).

The FedEx conference call was dominated by one key line of questioning: how much is spending changing depending on the tariff outlook? Was there a drop-off in spending and then a big rush to buy after levies were scaled back? Or a massive spike in demand ahead of potential tariffs that then subsided? In other words: was your success a one-off, or is it repeatable?

Those are some queries that seeped into first-quarter earnings discussions, despite Liberation Day coming after the end of March. Most notably, look at Apple’s iPhone sales. Some other instances where management faced questions surrounding pulled-forward demand in the Q1 reporting period included Texas Instruments, Power Integrations, Intrepid Potash, and Mobileye, to name a few.

“Whether or not there is consumer pull forward is TBD,” Chief Customer Officer Brie Carere said, while adding that activity over the quarter was also quite lumpy. “Customs entries in May were double the January through April average.”

If FedEx is any indication, these questions are going to get asked more and more often during the upcoming reporting period.

While executives may not have all the answers, FedEx’s poor guidance for the current quarter, as well as how poorly the stock is doing relative to the overall market, speaks volumes. The stock, which has a reputation as something of an economic bellwether given its connections to global trade and consumer demand, is trading at its lowest level relative to the S&P 500 since 2001, when the US was in recession after the dot-com bubble burst. 

It’s dangerous to extrapolate from any one company’s results, and FedEx’s underperformance includes company-specific issues and is certainly not a pure signal of impending US economic doom. But its C-Suite is far from the only one that continues to fret about the potential impact of levies on US imports and retaliatory measures from other countries.

The recent release of the Q2 CFO Survey reveals an increased level of angst around tariffs in corporate boardrooms. The share of firms that cited trade or tariffs as their most pressing concern picked up from Q1 to Q2.

Of note: this survey was conducted between May 19 and June 6, a period when the S&P 500 was already about 20% above its early April lows, reciprocal tariffs had already been watered down, and a trade truce with China had been reached.

Tariffs, in the eyes of the stock market, are a solved problem. In the eyes of US executives, they are not. 

“We have a referendum on global supply chains every single day,” FedEx president and CEO Rajesh Subramaniam said, which is obviously not an ideal operating environment, to say the least.

CFOSurvey

In addition to “what have you done for me lately?” the stock market is also a game of “what’s in the price?”

And that’s where another tidbit from FedEx bears monitoring: its capex budget for the 12 months ending May 2026 came in about half a billion below expectations, at $4.5 billion.

One firm’s capex is another firm’s profits. Because investment outlays are depreciated over time by the spender but recognized immediately as revenues by the recipient, capex has an accretive effect on overall earnings.

Thanks in large part to increased confidence in the longevity of the AI boom, S&P 500 12-month forward capex estimates are at all-time highs. So are earnings-per-share forecasts.

The good news is that FedEx, a decidedly un-AI company, is not as representative of the market-cap-weighted S&P 500, which is dominated by megacap tech firms.

The bad news is that sufficiently negative macroeconomic dynamics come for every firm, as we saw quite clearly during March and early April.

And the OK news is that it’s not clear FedEx is an especially potent macro bellwether, or whether the US economy is in the midst of a drawn-out slowdown or suffering a more severe loss of momentum.

We’ll have to wait for the real start of earnings season in a few weeks to find out.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Stock futures slide on Trump's 25% European tariff threat over Greenland, as gold and silver push higher

With US exchanges closed for MLK Day, European and Asian stock markets have been the main release valve for reaction to President Trump’s fresh tariff threats to Europe, which followed sharp pushback from European allies around America’s ongoing Greenland pursuit.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump warned that the US would impose tariffs on several European countries — Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland — unless a deal is reached for the “Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.” A 10% tariffs on “any and all goods” shipped to the US from the eight countries would take effect February 1, rising to 25% by the start of June if an agreement isn’t reached.

European stock markets opened lower, with the broad STOXX Europe 600 down 1.2%. France's CAC 40 index, Germany's DAX, and the UK's FTSE 100 fell 1.5%, 1.3%, and 0.5%, respectively, as of 5:12 a.m. ET. Asian markets also closed lower on global trade fears, with Tokyo's Nikkei 225 down 0.6%.

Although liquidity is thin, US risk assets weren’t entirely shielded, with S&P 500 Futures (Mar ‘26 E-Mini contract) down a little over 1% as of 5:45 a.m. ET. Bitcoin also dropped sharply, down ~2.5% from its undisturbed price.

Meanwhile, precious metals (again) hit all-time highs, with spot gold up more than 2% to a record $4,690 per ounce and silver hitting a record $94.08 per ounce, extending its rally this year.

TACO vs. TART?

A popular market narrative over the last year has been that President Trump often employs tariffs as threat, using them as a bargaining tool for other goals. But the “Trump Always Chickens Out” argument isn’t really borne out by the data. As Luke Kawa pointed out last year, the reality is that the US has raised its levies rate on both occasions that Trump has been in the White House, suggesting that the more accurate acronym is really: “Trump Always Raises Tariffs.” For now, this latest reactive threat to America’s allies looks more like a bargaining tool than a high-priority bit of trade policy.

markets

Nvidia’s H200 suppliers reportedly pause production after China blocks imports

The saga of Nvidia’s H200s has more confounding twists and turns than a house of mirrors.

On Friday evening, the Financial Times reported that suppliers for Nvidia’s H200 chips have halted production amid reports that Beijing has banned these processors from entering the country. Bloomberg had previously reported that China would begin to allow H200 imports for commercial use “as soon as this quarter.”

Nvidia called upon suppliers to boost output of components for these H200 chips after reportedly receiving more than 2 million orders from Chinese customers while only having roughly 700,000 in inventory.

Chinese policymakers have been keen on boosting their domestic semiconductor industry, with Nvidia’s H20 chips (a nerfed version of the H200) not breaking through into the market in a meaningful way even after export restrictions were lifted last year. Even though the H200 is considerably more powerful than the H20, recent reporting by both the FT and The Information suggests that regulators are similarly intent on limiting access.

That’s creating a more robust black market for Nvidia’s flagship Blackwell chips, per the FT:

One Chinese seller of Nvidia AI servers said many local customers had cancelled orders for the H200. Instead, they have switched to the more advanced B200 and B300, which are banned for export into China by Washington, leading to an active black market for the chips.

The Department of Commerce had recently revised its export review policy to lay the foundation for Nvidia to begin to ship these chips to the world’s second-largest economy, while US President Donald Trump imposed a 25% levy on H200 imports into the US that will not be used domestically (that is, will be brought in then re-exported to China). These announcements also cover AMD’s MI325X chips.

markets
Luke Kawa

How Claude Code “is the ChatGPT moment repeated” — and why that’s awful news for software stocks

The relentless slide in software stocks continues, with the iShares Expanded Tech Software ETF trading to the downside and lagging the market on Friday.

The growing adoption of Claude Code, and more recently, the launch of Claude Cowork by Anthropic, has been an attention-grabbing moment as to the power of AI agents and how they can be housed and operated solely under one highly integrated user interface.

To say that software stocks have fallen out of favor would be an understatement, as having this much industry-specific market pain is incredibly rare. Based on data going back to 2001, if IGV has fallen at least 5% over the past month, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF is typically also down between 5% to 6% over the same period. Less than 3% of the time does SPY rise at least 1% while software stocks have gotten slammed — 28 instances in total, going back to August 2001 — and three of those are the past three sessions. Their valuation compression has also been intense.

Doug O’Laughlin, president of SemiAnalysis, authored a thought-provoking piece on just how momentous this recent technological progress is, along with his views on how AI agents will displace software and what disrupted companies can do adapt. A couple excerpts:

Assuming it improves, has harnesses, and can continue to scale large context windows and only become marginally more intelligent, I believe this is enough to really take us to the next state of AI. I cannot stress enough that Claude Code is the ChatGPT moment repeated. You must try it to understand.

One day, the successor to Claude Code will make a superhuman interface available to everyone. And if Tokens were TCP/IP, Claude Code is the first genuine website built in the age of AI. And this is going to hurt a large part of the software industry.

I believe that all software must leave information work as soon as possible. I believe that the future role of software will not have much information processing’, i.e., analysis. Claude Code or Agent-Next will be doing the information synthesis, the GUI, and the workflow. That will be ephemeral and generated for the use at hand. Anyone should be able to access the information they want in the format they want and reference the underlying data.

What I’m trying to say is that the traditional differentiation metrics will change. Faster workflows, better UIs, and smoother integrations will all become worthless, while persistent information, a la an API, will become extremely valuable.

The growing adoption of Claude Code, and more recently, the launch of Claude Cowork by Anthropic, has been an attention-grabbing moment as to the power of AI agents and how they can be housed and operated solely under one highly integrated user interface.

To say that software stocks have fallen out of favor would be an understatement, as having this much industry-specific market pain is incredibly rare. Based on data going back to 2001, if IGV has fallen at least 5% over the past month, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF is typically also down between 5% to 6% over the same period. Less than 3% of the time does SPY rise at least 1% while software stocks have gotten slammed — 28 instances in total, going back to August 2001 — and three of those are the past three sessions. Their valuation compression has also been intense.

Doug O’Laughlin, president of SemiAnalysis, authored a thought-provoking piece on just how momentous this recent technological progress is, along with his views on how AI agents will displace software and what disrupted companies can do adapt. A couple excerpts:

Assuming it improves, has harnesses, and can continue to scale large context windows and only become marginally more intelligent, I believe this is enough to really take us to the next state of AI. I cannot stress enough that Claude Code is the ChatGPT moment repeated. You must try it to understand.

One day, the successor to Claude Code will make a superhuman interface available to everyone. And if Tokens were TCP/IP, Claude Code is the first genuine website built in the age of AI. And this is going to hurt a large part of the software industry.

I believe that all software must leave information work as soon as possible. I believe that the future role of software will not have much information processing’, i.e., analysis. Claude Code or Agent-Next will be doing the information synthesis, the GUI, and the workflow. That will be ephemeral and generated for the use at hand. Anyone should be able to access the information they want in the format they want and reference the underlying data.

What I’m trying to say is that the traditional differentiation metrics will change. Faster workflows, better UIs, and smoother integrations will all become worthless, while persistent information, a la an API, will become extremely valuable.

markets
Luke Kawa

Strategists sound alarm over silver’s rally, recommend options trades for potential violent reversal

Silver’s ridiculous romp higher in 2025 and at the start of this year is showing some signs of fraying around the edges.

And with just how fierce the move higher has been, strategists are warning of the potential for intense downside as some of the key parts of the fundamental and technical theses for silver are starting to look less solid.

Michael Purves, CEO of Tallbacken Capital Advisors, who’s been bullish on the shiny metal, thinks it’s once again time to hedge long exposure.

On Thursday, he recommended selling $95 strike calls on the iShares Silver Trust that expire in February to purchase $75 strike puts.

Purves previously recommended that clients hedge their silver exposure on December 26 (its 2025 peak) before declaring that the coast was once again clear for longs on December 30.

“It might be surprising to know that speculative long silver futures positions are at 20 month lows, or that Open Interest is at five year lows,” he wrote. “Once again, hedging long positions is in order — particularly given the distorted put-call skew which allows [investors] to sell calls to finance long put positions.”

Viresh Kanabar, an investment strategist at Macro Hive, followed this up on Friday by flagging one of several key changes in the market structure for silver. The physical market tightness, cited by bulls as an important driver behind silver’s skyward ascent, is showing signs of reversing.

“1m forwards on physical silver have flipped back to contango,” he wrote. “This lines up with physical ETF outflows and evidence that high prices are weighing on industrial demand.”

Silver contango

“In short, we are not bullish on silver at these levels, instead, see increasing signs of risks skewing to the downside,” Kanabar added.

David Cervantes, founder of Pinebrook Capital Management, told clients on Thursday that he’s taken a short position in silver by owning put options on SLV with three months to expiry, noting that its outperformance of the stock market over the past 100 and 252 days has reached unprecedented levels.

“THIS IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE AND A SMALL GAMBLE-SIZED WAGER WILL BE MADE OVER WHICH SLEEP WILL NOT BE LOST,” he emphasized.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.