Markets
Arizona Diamondbacks Visit the MLB Fan Cave
Heath Bell of the Arizona Diamondbacks tries out the hamster wheel at the MLB Fan Cave (Thomas Levinson/Getty Images)

RBC hikes S&P 500 price target, sees US stocks running in place through year-end

“Investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026,” Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina wrote.

Luke Kawa

RBC Capital Markets is lifting its 2025 price target for the S&P 500 to 6,250 from 5,730.

But unlike Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, whose strategists also recently upgraded their price targets on the benchmark US stock index and see the rally continuing, RBC’s view implies that stocks will effectively go nowhere through year-end. (The S&P 500 closed just above 6,280 on July 11.)

Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina noted that the five models the team uses to come up with this price target have a very wide range: from a low of 5,700 to a high of 6,500.

In a year where trade policy has been both volatile and a major driver of price action, her team no longer finds it appropriate to try to assess where the S&P 500 will go by making a judgment on whether the political environment is supportive of or detrimental to the stock market.

“In January we were baking in the annual average return when Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress, a gain of 11% which we thought was a good way to bake in the idea of the business-friendly backdrop for stocks,” she wrote. “Our more bearish forecasts for 2025 swapped in the S&P 500’s return in 2018 (-6.2%) as a way to approximate the challenges posed to stocks by tariffs and heightened policy uncertainty. Neither approach seems appropriate today, particularly since the S&P 500 is no longer trading in sync with the President’s polling numbers. And, so, we’ve put aside attempts to contextualize the policy backdrop for now.”

The key change underpinning RBC’s rosier stance is below (emphasis added):

Most importantly, we’ve adjusted our way of thinking about the economic signal for the stock market. As was the case in our prior forecast, we are baking in the idea that the S&P 500 tends to fall -3.4% during years that see real GDP in the 1.1-2% range (RBC Economics and consensus are both looking for real GDP of 1.5% in 2025). But investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026. While it seems early to us to do so, we think it’s important to be mindful of this shift in investor focus, and so we’ve added in a second GDP test that bakes in how stocks perform in years that precede real GDP in the 1.1-2% range. Both RBC Economics and consensus anticipate another year like this in 2026, with RBC Economics’ forecast coming in at 1.3% and consensus tracking at 1.6%. In those “prior years” before 1.1-2% GDP occurs, the S&P 500 tends to gain about 8% on a full year basis, math that pegs fair value for the index in Dec 2025 at 6,352. Adding in this new way of looking at the GDP signal, and removing our policy assumption, was the biggest contributor to the change in our forecast today.

It’s admittedly a very peculiar situation. To sum up RBC’s position, years like this year from a growth standpoint are generally poor for the S&P 500; growth this year is expected to be similar to growth next year, but since the years before slower-growth years tend to be solid for the stock market, RBC thinks the S&P 500 will hold on to its year-to-date gains.

RBC is simultaneously de-emphasizing the importance of this year by referencing how investors are looking forward to 2026 — a year when their signal would be telling them stocks should be weak because growth is relatively low! — and changing the way they think about how stocks should perform this year by not looking at this year on its own merits, but rather treating it as a year that comes before a year estimated to be a rather sluggish period for economic activity, even though growth in both years is anticipated to be broadly comparable.

Clear? Clear.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

SpaceX gets a wave of bullish ratings from Wall Street analysts

SpaceX received more than a dozen positive analyst calls on Tuesday — including from major Wall Street banks — as they initiate coverage on Elon Musk’s space and AI company.

SpaceX went public on June 12 at a $2.2 trillion valuation, the largest debut in history. While the company hasn’t yet posted a profit, it seems to have convinced Wall Street that it will get there and grow its valuation on the way.

Of the at least 17 analysts that gave a rating on Tuesday, all but one gave it a “buy” or “outperform” rating. MoffettNathanson was "neutral."

The ratings come as SpaceX joined the Nasdaq 100 index, a benchmark tech-heavy basket of companies that underpins millions of portfolios. The inclusion adds built-in demand for the stock from index funds and ETFs.

Still, SpaceX fell more than 5% on Tuesday amid a broader sell-off, and is currently effectively flat from its opening price of $150 a share.

markets

Nike sinks to lowest level since 2014 after warning of “challenged” sales environment in Q4 report

Did Nike do it?

Investors had a mixed reaction after the global sports apparel company reported its fourth quarter earnings on Tuesday after the bell. Shares initially rose 5% as Nike beat out Wall Street expectations amid a hefty tariff refund bonus. However, the stock then sank to its lowest level since August 2014 in postmarket trading.

Here are the Q4 numbers:

  • Revenue of $11.0 billion (estimate: $10.8 billion).

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $0.20 (estimate: $0.12).

Ahead of this report, Nike warned that results would be flattered by a one-time tariff refund (now estimated at roughly $0.52 per share for the bottom line). That gave the company an extra cushion in snapping its streak of seven quarters of year-over-year profit declines.

Over the past year, the company had been punished by tariffs on imported goods, stagnant consumer spending, and increasing competition from other footwear brands like New Balance, Adidas, and Hoka.

Outgoing CFO Matthew Friend deemed it an “increasingly challenging operating environment, where sell-through remains challenged.”

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.