Markets
Arizona Diamondbacks Visit the MLB Fan Cave
Heath Bell of the Arizona Diamondbacks tries out the hamster wheel at the MLB Fan Cave (Thomas Levinson/Getty Images)

RBC hikes S&P 500 price target, sees US stocks running in place through year-end

“Investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026,” Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina wrote.

Luke Kawa

RBC Capital Markets is lifting its 2025 price target for the S&P 500 to 6,250 from 5,730.

But unlike Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, whose strategists also recently upgraded their price targets on the benchmark US stock index and see the rally continuing, RBC’s view implies that stocks will effectively go nowhere through year-end. (The S&P 500 closed just above 6,280 on July 11.)

Chief US Equity Strategist Lori Calvasina noted that the five models the team uses to come up with this price target have a very wide range: from a low of 5,700 to a high of 6,500.

In a year where trade policy has been both volatile and a major driver of price action, her team no longer finds it appropriate to try to assess where the S&P 500 will go by making a judgment on whether the political environment is supportive of or detrimental to the stock market.

“In January we were baking in the annual average return when Republicans control the White House and both chambers of Congress, a gain of 11% which we thought was a good way to bake in the idea of the business-friendly backdrop for stocks,” she wrote. “Our more bearish forecasts for 2025 swapped in the S&P 500’s return in 2018 (-6.2%) as a way to approximate the challenges posed to stocks by tariffs and heightened policy uncertainty. Neither approach seems appropriate today, particularly since the S&P 500 is no longer trading in sync with the President’s polling numbers. And, so, we’ve put aside attempts to contextualize the policy backdrop for now.”

The key change underpinning RBC’s rosier stance is below (emphasis added):

Most importantly, we’ve adjusted our way of thinking about the economic signal for the stock market. As was the case in our prior forecast, we are baking in the idea that the S&P 500 tends to fall -3.4% during years that see real GDP in the 1.1-2% range (RBC Economics and consensus are both looking for real GDP of 1.5% in 2025). But investors have been telling us that they are ready to start pricing in 2026. While it seems early to us to do so, we think it’s important to be mindful of this shift in investor focus, and so we’ve added in a second GDP test that bakes in how stocks perform in years that precede real GDP in the 1.1-2% range. Both RBC Economics and consensus anticipate another year like this in 2026, with RBC Economics’ forecast coming in at 1.3% and consensus tracking at 1.6%. In those “prior years” before 1.1-2% GDP occurs, the S&P 500 tends to gain about 8% on a full year basis, math that pegs fair value for the index in Dec 2025 at 6,352. Adding in this new way of looking at the GDP signal, and removing our policy assumption, was the biggest contributor to the change in our forecast today.

It’s admittedly a very peculiar situation. To sum up RBC’s position, years like this year from a growth standpoint are generally poor for the S&P 500; growth this year is expected to be similar to growth next year, but since the years before slower-growth years tend to be solid for the stock market, RBC thinks the S&P 500 will hold on to its year-to-date gains.

RBC is simultaneously de-emphasizing the importance of this year by referencing how investors are looking forward to 2026 — a year when their signal would be telling them stocks should be weak because growth is relatively low! — and changing the way they think about how stocks should perform this year by not looking at this year on its own merits, but rather treating it as a year that comes before a year estimated to be a rather sluggish period for economic activity, even though growth in both years is anticipated to be broadly comparable.

Clear? Clear.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Southwest reports lower-than-expected Q1 earnings and revenue, declines to offer full-year profit update

Southwest Airlines reported its first-quarter earnings after the bell on Wednesday. Its shares fell more than 6% in after-hours trading.

For the first quarter, Southwest reported:

  • Adjusted earnings of $0.45 per share, compared to the $0.47 per share expected by Wall Street analysts polled by Factset.

  • Revenue of $7.25 billion, compared to estimates of $7.27 billion.

The carrier guided for adjusted earnings of between $0.35 and $0.65 per share for its second quarter, a range whose midpoint is below analyst estimates of $0.53 per share. Regarding its full-year 2026 earnings estimate of “at least” $4 per share, Southwest declined to give an update “given the ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty.”

“Achieving this outcome would require lower fuel prices and/or stronger revenue performance to offset higher fuel expense,” Southwest said.

Southwest introduced bag fees last year, ending a more than five-decade-long “bags fly free” policy. Earlier this month, less than a year after the change, it joined its major US rivals in hiking its bag fees by $10 amid surging jet fuel prices.

Southwest, which discontinued its fuel-hedging program last year, said it spent $1.36 billion on fuel and related taxes in the first quarter, up 8.6% year over year.

markets

ServiceNow dives after reporting sequential decline in profit margins

Cloud software giant ServiceNow — which has been something of a poster child for the AI-related software sell-off — saw its shares fall sharply after delivering Q1 results that included a quarter-on-quarter decline in profit margins.

The company reported:

  • Revenue of $3.77 billion, higher than the $3.75 billion analyst consensus estimate published by FactSet.

  • Diluted adjusted earnings of $0.97 per share, on point with the $0.97 analysts had expected.

  • Subscription revenue of $3.67 billion vs. the $3.65 billion predicted.

  • Non-GAAP gross margins of 79.5%, down from 80.5% in Q4.

ServiceNow issued guidance for Q2 subscription revenues of between $3.815 billion and $3.820 billion, compared to the $3.75 billion FactSet consensus estimate.

ServiceNow shares have been at the epicenter of the software sell-off driven by the fear that such companies are at risk of being rendered obsolete by AI. The stock was down 33% for the year through the end of the New York trading session on Wednesday.

markets

IBM falls despite posting better-than-expected Q1 results

Big Blue fell in after-hours trading despite reporting better-than-expected Q1 results, as it didn’t include in the release an internal metric it typically discloses to track the progress of its AI business. IBM reported: 

  • Q1 revenue of $15.92 billion vs. the $15.63 billion FactSet consensus estimate.

  • Adjusted earnings per share of $1.91 vs. the $1.81 consensus expectation.

  • Sales of $7.05 billion at its key, high-margin software segment vs. a $6.98 billion consensus of nine analyst estimates.

  • Sales of $3.33 billion in its infrastructure unit, which houses its growing AI mainframe business, vs. a $3.13 billion consensus estimate.

Unlike recent earnings statements, the company made no mention of an internal metric it used to track its progress in AI, which it called its “generative AI book of business.” That metric stood at $12.5 billion at the end of 2025, per the company.

The infrastructure business is of acute interest to the market, after AI giant Anthropic announced in February that Claude Code could efficiently modernize code bases in the COBOL programming language, which serves as a cornerstone of IBM’s enterprise mainframe business. The language is still widely used in certain industries, such as airlines and finance. (ATMs, for instance, run almost entirely on COBOL.) 

Anthropic’s COBOL announcement cut the legs out from under IBM. The stock plunged 13% on February 23, the day of the announcement — its worst daily drop in more than 25 years. And it was down roughly 15% for the year through the end of trading Wednesday.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC. Futures and event contracts are offered through Robinhood Derivatives, LLC.