Power
Amazon risk factors
Quarterly mentions of Amazon and AWS as a risk factor on company 10-Ks had been going up for years. They peaked in 2022 and then began declining in 2023 and 2024.

Companies aren’t talking about Amazon as much as they used to

Who’s afraid of the big bad internet behemoth?

Amazon has long been the bogeyman in the boardroom.

For years it seemed all companies could talk about in their annual 10-K filings, which includes a section called Risk Factors where companies lists the most significant threats to their business, was Amazon and its Web Services division. The number of documents citing Amazon or AWS as a risk factor just kept going up.

But recently, that’s changed. In the last two years, such mentions of Amazon have started to come down, according to data from market intelligence platform AlphaSense.

Mentions on earnings transcripts and within filings overall have declined too, according to data from FactSet.

For example, travel site Booking.com, mentioned Amazon as a risk last year but didn’t this year. Last year it wrote, “Some of our current and potential competitors, such as Google, Apple, Alibaba, Tencent, Amazon, Uber, and Meta, have significantly more customers or users, consumer data, and financial and other resources than we do,” while this year it just said those competitors “include the largest global technology companies.”

It’s unlikely that Amazon, which ranks among the most valuable companies in the world by market cap, has become less of a risk. So why the relative silence?

There could be a few reasons. There are fewer public companies these days and Big Tech companies like Amazon have been buying up would-be public companies, but that’s a long-running trend that Amazon had bucked. It could also be that companies have become more cagey when it comes to mentioning their tech stacks. It’s also possible that Amazon is just not news anymore. Companies have already adopted the cloud and Amazon might be so omnipresent it no longer warrants mention (though if it’s still a risk companies should probably say so in their 10-Ks). Notably, obvious competitors like Walmart and Google never mention Amazon as a risk.

Still, it bears mention that a huge number of companies still mention Amazon among their risk factors, either due to competition from or relationships with the online retail and internet behemoth, including UPS, Roku, Netflix, Pinterest, Mattel, Sonos, American Express, and Uber.

Interestingly, Amazon — which itself has threatened to disrupt Walmart, retail in general, package delivery, bookstores, grocery stores, healthcare, you name it — has lately been finding itself in more of a defensive position than it’s used to, as it focusses on fending off other e-commerce upstarts like Temu and Shein.

“Competition continues to intensify, including with the development of new business models and the entry of new and well-funded competitors,” its latest 10-K reads, as it has for years, without mentioning any companies by name.

And maybe there is more competition that other companies are worried about. Of course, Amazon also has a vested interested in appearing to have competition, since these days antitrust regulators are what it’s most afraid of.

Amazon, whose stock risen lately thanks to the company’s AI efforts, reports earnings after market close today. Let us know if you have other theories as to why Amazon is seeming like less of a risk.

More Power

See all Power
power
Jon Keegan

Anthropic donates $20 million to pro-AI regulation PAC

The war to build a better AI model may be mostly happening in Silicon Valley, but now another important front has opened: Washington, DC.

Anthropic announced a $20 million donation to Public First Action, a new super PAC that advocates for AI policies and regulations that prioritize public safety. The PAC describes itself as “a counterforce that will defend the public interest against those who aim to buy their way out of sensible rule-making.”

The move is seen as a counter to OpenAI’s growing investments in PACs that argue for less AI regulation.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

power

Looking into its Warner Bros. acquisition, the DOJ probes Netflix for anticompetitive tactics

As the Department of Justice probes Netflix’s proposed $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, it has reportedly subpoenaed at least one other entertainment company to investigate whether the streamer has taken part in anticompetitive behavior.

Netflix said the DOJ is conducting a standard review and it expects its acquisition to be approved.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

power

Report: Meta pouring $65 million into PACs backing pro-AI state candidates

With a pro-tech, pro-AI administration in Washington, DC, Meta has decided the next battlegrounds that it needs to flood with cash are in individual states.

Starting in Meta’s home state of California, the tech giant is pledging $65 million to a pair of super PACs that it created to fund pro-tech and pro-AI candidates at the state level, according to a report from Politico.

Meta has funded the American Technology Excellence Project ($45 million) and Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California ($20 million) to push back on what it sees as burdensome AI regulations coming from state legislatures.

The META California PAC will support tech-friendly candidates regardless of party.

Starting in Meta’s home state of California, the tech giant is pledging $65 million to a pair of super PACs that it created to fund pro-tech and pro-AI candidates at the state level, according to a report from Politico.

Meta has funded the American Technology Excellence Project ($45 million) and Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California ($20 million) to push back on what it sees as burdensome AI regulations coming from state legislatures.

The META California PAC will support tech-friendly candidates regardless of party.

TrumpRx

When is TrumpRx launching?

Not on schedule, for one thing.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.