Power
Slider of Cards Against Humanity Texas property before and after Elon Musk 2
Sherwood News

Before and after: Aerial photos show what being Elon Musk's neighbor can do to your land

Cards Against Humanity, which owns land in Texas, is suing the space billionaire to “un-fuck” its property and reputation, to the tune of $15 million.

Whoever had “Cards Against Humanity sues Elon Musk’s SpaceX” on their 2024 bingo card, you win. This month the party game company filed a lawsuit seeking $15 million in damages from SpaceX for trespassing and dumping on its land as well as interfering in its business relationships.

In case you’re wondering how this strange clash between a card game and a cartoon billionaire came to be: Cards Against Humanity (CAH) originally purchased a property along the Texas-Mexico border in August 2017 in an attempt to thwart then-president Donald Trump’s border wall. It raised $2.25 million from supporters ($15 each from 150,000 people) to pay for the land as well as to secure a law firm that specializes in eminent domain to “make it as time-consuming and expensive as possible for Trump to build his wall.”

Since the purchase, CAH has gotten new neighbors — and problems with a new billionaire. Musk’s SpaceX, which has a launch facility 3 miles away, has since purchased the plots of land on either side of CAH. (A spokesperson for CAH said they didn’t know when those transactions took place and SpaceX did not immediately respond to requests for comment.)

Here’s Google Earth imagery of what the land looked like in March 2022, a few years after CAH (using an LLC called Hole Holding) purchased it, versus April of this year after SpaceX began developing the plots. It appears SpaceX has altered both its and CAH's property.

As CAH phrased it on its website for the lawsuit, Elon Musk “figured he could just dump his shit all over our gorgeous plot of land without asking.” CAH said that after confronting SpaceX, the company in October of last year made a lowball offer for less than half the land’s value and gave them a 12-hour ultimatum in which to accept.

‘We said, “Go fuck yourself, Elon Musk. We’ll see you in court,”’ CAH wrote.

The 0.39 acres of property CAH owns was valued at around $2,150 when it was purchased and now is appraised at about $35,000, according to the county.

Here are some before and after photos of the land, provided by CAH in the lawsuit:

Before

Cards Against Humanity land before Elon Musk 1
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land before Elon Musk 2
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land before Elon Musk 3
Cards Against Humanity

After

Cards Against Humanity land after Elon Musk 1
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land after Elon Musk 2
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land after Elon Musk 3
Cards Against Humanity

“[N]one of the materials, none of the workers depicted in these pictures are owned by or associated with CAH in any way,” CAH said in its lawsuit. “SpaceX has never asked for permission to use the Property, much less for the egregious appropriation of the Property for its own profit-making purposes.”

CAH said SpaceX cleared the property of vegetation, spread gravel, ran generators, and trampled over the property with construction vehicles. CAH says it strove to keep the “pristine vacant property untouched by development nor impacted in any way to affect its original natural condition” mostly as they found it, simply mowing it and marking the property with a fence and a “No Trespassing” sign.

A CAH spokesperson said that the equipment and materials were still on the property as of the lawsuit’s filing.

Reuters has an excellent piece about how SpaceX has bought up properties and politicians in the area, sending property values up but the quality of life down. Musk is also facing blowback for environmental destruction at some of his other companies, including xAI in Tennessee and the Boring Company closer to Austin Texas.

In the lawsuit, the board game’s owners write that “CAH’s relationship with its supporters is its most precious asset both in the form of its current relationship and the prospective relationship in the future,” it says. “SpaceX’s acts have caused damage to both relationships in a variety of ways, but, in particular, by creating the impression that there is some association between CAH and SpaceX.”

CAH says it hopes to pay out the $15 million it is seeking in the suit via $100 payments to each of the 150,000 who originally donated money for the land. The site also says it will accept Twitter.com as compensation, a dig at how much less the company now called X is worth since Musk purchased it in 2022 for $44 billion.

Jon Keegan contributed reporting.

More Power

See all Power
power
Jon Keegan

Anthropic donates $20 million to pro-AI regulation PAC

The war to build a better AI model may be mostly happening in Silicon Valley, but now another important front has opened: Washington, DC.

Anthropic announced a $20 million donation to Public First Action, a new super PAC that advocates for AI policies and regulations that prioritize public safety. The PAC describes itself as “a counterforce that will defend the public interest against those who aim to buy their way out of sensible rule-making.”

The move is seen as a counter to OpenAI’s growing investments in PACs that argue for less AI regulation.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

power

Looking into its Warner Bros. acquisition, the DOJ probes Netflix for anticompetitive tactics

As the Department of Justice probes Netflix’s proposed $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, it has reportedly subpoenaed at least one other entertainment company to investigate whether the streamer has taken part in anticompetitive behavior.

Netflix said the DOJ is conducting a standard review and it expects its acquisition to be approved.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

power

Report: Meta pouring $65 million into PACs backing pro-AI state candidates

With a pro-tech, pro-AI administration in Washington, DC, Meta has decided the next battlegrounds that it needs to flood with cash are in individual states.

Starting in Meta’s home state of California, the tech giant is pledging $65 million to a pair of super PACs that it created to fund pro-tech and pro-AI candidates at the state level, according to a report from Politico.

Meta has funded the American Technology Excellence Project ($45 million) and Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California ($20 million) to push back on what it sees as burdensome AI regulations coming from state legislatures.

The META California PAC will support tech-friendly candidates regardless of party.

Starting in Meta’s home state of California, the tech giant is pledging $65 million to a pair of super PACs that it created to fund pro-tech and pro-AI candidates at the state level, according to a report from Politico.

Meta has funded the American Technology Excellence Project ($45 million) and Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California ($20 million) to push back on what it sees as burdensome AI regulations coming from state legislatures.

The META California PAC will support tech-friendly candidates regardless of party.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.