Power
Slider of Cards Against Humanity Texas property before and after Elon Musk 2
Sherwood News

Before and after: Aerial photos show what being Elon Musk's neighbor can do to your land

Cards Against Humanity, which owns land in Texas, is suing the space billionaire to “un-fuck” its property and reputation, to the tune of $15 million.

Whoever had “Cards Against Humanity sues Elon Musk’s SpaceX” on their 2024 bingo card, you win. This month the party game company filed a lawsuit seeking $15 million in damages from SpaceX for trespassing and dumping on its land as well as interfering in its business relationships.

In case you’re wondering how this strange clash between a card game and a cartoon billionaire came to be: Cards Against Humanity (CAH) originally purchased a property along the Texas-Mexico border in August 2017 in an attempt to thwart then-president Donald Trump’s border wall. It raised $2.25 million from supporters ($15 each from 150,000 people) to pay for the land as well as to secure a law firm that specializes in eminent domain to “make it as time-consuming and expensive as possible for Trump to build his wall.”

Since the purchase, CAH has gotten new neighbors — and problems with a new billionaire. Musk’s SpaceX, which has a launch facility 3 miles away, has since purchased the plots of land on either side of CAH. (A spokesperson for CAH said they didn’t know when those transactions took place and SpaceX did not immediately respond to requests for comment.)

Here’s Google Earth imagery of what the land looked like in March 2022, a few years after CAH (using an LLC called Hole Holding) purchased it, versus April of this year after SpaceX began developing the plots. It appears SpaceX has altered both its and CAH's property.

As CAH phrased it on its website for the lawsuit, Elon Musk “figured he could just dump his shit all over our gorgeous plot of land without asking.” CAH said that after confronting SpaceX, the company in October of last year made a lowball offer for less than half the land’s value and gave them a 12-hour ultimatum in which to accept.

‘We said, “Go fuck yourself, Elon Musk. We’ll see you in court,”’ CAH wrote.

The 0.39 acres of property CAH owns was valued at around $2,150 when it was purchased and now is appraised at about $35,000, according to the county.

Here are some before and after photos of the land, provided by CAH in the lawsuit:

Before

Cards Against Humanity land before Elon Musk 1
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land before Elon Musk 2
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land before Elon Musk 3
Cards Against Humanity

After

Cards Against Humanity land after Elon Musk 1
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land after Elon Musk 2
Cards Against Humanity
Cards Against Humanity land after Elon Musk 3
Cards Against Humanity

“[N]one of the materials, none of the workers depicted in these pictures are owned by or associated with CAH in any way,” CAH said in its lawsuit. “SpaceX has never asked for permission to use the Property, much less for the egregious appropriation of the Property for its own profit-making purposes.”

CAH said SpaceX cleared the property of vegetation, spread gravel, ran generators, and trampled over the property with construction vehicles. CAH says it strove to keep the “pristine vacant property untouched by development nor impacted in any way to affect its original natural condition” mostly as they found it, simply mowing it and marking the property with a fence and a “No Trespassing” sign.

A CAH spokesperson said that the equipment and materials were still on the property as of the lawsuit’s filing.

Reuters has an excellent piece about how SpaceX has bought up properties and politicians in the area, sending property values up but the quality of life down. Musk is also facing blowback for environmental destruction at some of his other companies, including xAI in Tennessee and the Boring Company closer to Austin Texas.

In the lawsuit, the board game’s owners write that “CAH’s relationship with its supporters is its most precious asset both in the form of its current relationship and the prospective relationship in the future,” it says. “SpaceX’s acts have caused damage to both relationships in a variety of ways, but, in particular, by creating the impression that there is some association between CAH and SpaceX.”

CAH says it hopes to pay out the $15 million it is seeking in the suit via $100 payments to each of the 150,000 who originally donated money for the land. The site also says it will accept Twitter.com as compensation, a dig at how much less the company now called X is worth since Musk purchased it in 2022 for $44 billion.

Jon Keegan contributed reporting.

More Power

See all Power
power

Warner Bros. Discovery’s board tells shareholders to turn down Paramount’s “inadequate” hostile bid

Warner Bros. Discovery has told shareholders to reject Paramount’s hostile takeover bid, with the company releasing a statement early Wednesday urging shareholders to take the Netflix offer on the table. WBD’s board of directors said the outcome of the Netflix deal is “extraordinary by any measure.”

Paramount’s offer, in contrast, was described in the letter as “illusory,” providing “inadequate value,” and likely to impose “numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.” The board said Paramount has “misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family,” and the board also outlined that it doesn’t believe there is a “material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.”

WBD shares dipped in the minutes leading up to the market close on Tuesday after news leaked that its management was preparing to encourage shareholders to reject Paramounts bid, and shares of the HBO parent were down at $28.66, off 0.83% from yesterday’s close, as of 7:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Netflix was ticking higher, up around 1.7%, and Paramount Skydance was modestly in the red, down 1%.

Several outlets have reported that Jared Kushners firm would back out of the group that had been assembled to help finance the Paramount bid. Confirming this withdrawal, a spokesperson for the firm helmed by the president’s son-in-law told NBC News that “the dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

Analysts this month have said that a renewed bidding war for Warner Bros. seems “inevitable” given the antitrust concerns surrounding Netflix’s potential acquisition. President Trump on Tuesday appeared to distance himself from speculation around his closeness to Paramount’s owners, posting on Truth Social, “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Warner’s attempt to influence its shareholders could fuel a higher bid from Paramount in the coming weeks — shareholders currently have until January 8 to decide whether to accept the current offer.

Paramount’s offer, in contrast, was described in the letter as “illusory,” providing “inadequate value,” and likely to impose “numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.” The board said Paramount has “misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family,” and the board also outlined that it doesn’t believe there is a “material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.”

WBD shares dipped in the minutes leading up to the market close on Tuesday after news leaked that its management was preparing to encourage shareholders to reject Paramounts bid, and shares of the HBO parent were down at $28.66, off 0.83% from yesterday’s close, as of 7:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Netflix was ticking higher, up around 1.7%, and Paramount Skydance was modestly in the red, down 1%.

Several outlets have reported that Jared Kushners firm would back out of the group that had been assembled to help finance the Paramount bid. Confirming this withdrawal, a spokesperson for the firm helmed by the president’s son-in-law told NBC News that “the dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

Analysts this month have said that a renewed bidding war for Warner Bros. seems “inevitable” given the antitrust concerns surrounding Netflix’s potential acquisition. President Trump on Tuesday appeared to distance himself from speculation around his closeness to Paramount’s owners, posting on Truth Social, “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Warner’s attempt to influence its shareholders could fuel a higher bid from Paramount in the coming weeks — shareholders currently have until January 8 to decide whether to accept the current offer.

power
Jon Keegan

Senators open investigation into data centers’ effect on consumer utility bills

As Big Tech builds more and more massive data centers in small towns around the country, the public is starting to ask questions about whether they are to blame for rising utility bills.

Today Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) sent letters to the CEOs of some of the biggest builders of data centers: Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, CoreWeave, Digital Realty, and Equinix.

The senators wrote:

“Utility companies have spent billions of dollars updating the electrical grid to accommodate the unprecedented energy demands of AI data centers and appear to recoup the costs by raising residential utility bills. Through these utility price increases, American families bankroll the electricity costs of trillion-dollar tech companies.”

Electricity prices in the US are indeed up, rising 6.2% since last year. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that ratepayers within 50 miles of data centers saw rates increase up to 276% over the past five years.

The companies have until January 12, 2026, to respond to the senators.

The senators wrote:

“Utility companies have spent billions of dollars updating the electrical grid to accommodate the unprecedented energy demands of AI data centers and appear to recoup the costs by raising residential utility bills. Through these utility price increases, American families bankroll the electricity costs of trillion-dollar tech companies.”

Electricity prices in the US are indeed up, rising 6.2% since last year. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that ratepayers within 50 miles of data centers saw rates increase up to 276% over the past five years.

The companies have until January 12, 2026, to respond to the senators.

power
Hyunsoo Rim

TIME names the “Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year for 2025

TIME just announced its Person of the Year… and it’s not a single person.  

The magazine selected the “Architects of AI” as its 2025 honoree, spotlighting the executives and engineers behind the year’s AI boom. One of the two covers features eight tech leaders perched on a steel beam — recreating the iconic “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper” photo from 1932 — including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, AMD’s Lisa Su, xAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the center, whose chips power many of today’s AI models.

Western Auctioneer with Two Fingers up and Gavel in Hand

As investors pick sides in Netflix vs. Paramount, analysts say a renewed Warner Bros. bidding war looks inevitable

Analysts at Bloomberg on Wednesday said Paramount’s WBD hostile takeover offer could go as high as $35 per share.

Netflix WBD CEOs

The Netflix-Warner Bros. deal now faces a wall of opposition

Netflix will owe Warner Bros. $5.8 billion in cash if the deal is terminated on antitrust grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.