Power
Elon Musk Holds Town Hall With Pennsylvania Voters in Lancaster
(Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
MUSK.GOV

Elon Musk: Government support for me, but not for thee

Musk’s businesses have all benefited greatly from government loans and subsidies.

Jon Keegan

As Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s DOGE team gains access to US government agencies’ computer systems to root out suspected waste and fraud, Musk and his supporters appear to be SHOCKED to find that the government pays money to businesses for things like subscriptions to news publications.

President Trump posted on Truth Social today that finding $8 million worth of government subscriptions to the widely read Politico Pro newsletter could be “THE BIGGEST SCANDAL OF THEM ALL.”

Musk has been updating his followers on X with examples of government spending he finds outrageous, including government support of National Public Radio.

The nature of the government financial support that NPR receives is a little complicated, as federal law mandates the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to distribute funds to local public TV and radio stations, which in turn choose to pay NPR to license programming like “Morning Edition” and “All Things Considered.”

NPR’s website says that “on average, less than 1% of NPRs annual operating budget comes in the form of grants from CPB and federal agencies and departments.”

Basically, a federal law passed by Congress in 1976 created public funding infrastructure to serve the public good, and a portion of those funds flow to NPR, which is largely supported by corporate sponsorships, programming fees, and listener donations.

Musk.gov

But much of Musk’s vast business empire might not exist were it not for significant taxpayer support in the form of loans and subsidies.

Tesla

  • In 2010, the Obama administration agreed to loan pre-IPO Tesla $465 million through the US Department of Energy to expand its business and support a domestic EV industry. Tesla paid the loan back in 2013, a year early (resulting in a penalty).

  • Tesla received $64 million in state and local tax incentives for its Texas Gigafactory.

  • Tesla has received over $41.9 million in federal contracts since 2008.

  • Tesla has benefited from state government incentives related to its factories, such as Nevada’s $1.3 billion incentives for its sprawling Nevada Gigafactory — including another $330 million to expand the facility.

Yet Musk is calling for an end to the $7,500 EV tax credit that his company benefits from, tweeting, “Take away the subsidies. It will only help Tesla.”

SpaceX

Musk’s SpaceX counts the US government as a key customer for launching satellites and sending astronauts and supplies to the International Space Station.

  • SpaceX has received over $18.5 billion in revenue from the Department of Defense and NASA.

  • SpaceX’s Starlink has government contracts for supplying space-based internet to Ukrainian troops through the DOD.

  • Starlink also had contracts with USAID, the current target of Musk’s cost-cutting campaign.

Musk’s business entanglements with government agencies are now under increased scrutiny as lawmakers scramble to understand what exactly Musk’s team of teenage staffers are doing with newly granted access to several government agencies.

Yesterday, in his capacity as ranking member of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, Senator Richard Blumenthal sent letters to six of Musk’s companies (Tesla, SpaceX, X, xAI, The Boring Company, and Neuralink) demanding information surrounding possible conflicts of interests arising from Musk’s DOGE activities.

Blumenthal wrote:

“Mr. Musk’s dual roles — running a for-profit corporation while serving in public office — not only create glaring conflicts of interest that pose grave risks for America’s most sacred institutions, but may also violate federal law… PSI is conducting a preliminary inquiry into DOGE and the ramifications of its conduct. ”

More Power

See all Power
power

Warner Bros. Discovery’s board tells shareholders to turn down Paramount’s “inadequate” hostile bid

Warner Bros. Discovery has told shareholders to reject Paramount’s hostile takeover bid, with the company releasing a statement early Wednesday urging shareholders to take the Netflix offer on the table. WBD’s board of directors said the outcome of the Netflix deal is “extraordinary by any measure.”

Paramount’s offer, in contrast, was described in the letter as “illusory,” providing “inadequate value,” and likely to impose “numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.” The board said Paramount has “misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family,” and the board also outlined that it doesn’t believe there is a “material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.”

WBD shares dipped in the minutes leading up to the market close on Tuesday after news leaked that its management was preparing to encourage shareholders to reject Paramounts bid, and shares of the HBO parent were down at $28.66, off 0.83% from yesterday’s close, as of 7:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Netflix was ticking higher, up around 1.7%, and Paramount Skydance was modestly in the red, down 1%.

Several outlets have reported that Jared Kushners firm would back out of the group that had been assembled to help finance the Paramount bid. Confirming this withdrawal, a spokesperson for the firm helmed by the president’s son-in-law told NBC News that “the dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

Analysts this month have said that a renewed bidding war for Warner Bros. seems “inevitable” given the antitrust concerns surrounding Netflix’s potential acquisition. President Trump on Tuesday appeared to distance himself from speculation around his closeness to Paramount’s owners, posting on Truth Social, “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Warner’s attempt to influence its shareholders could fuel a higher bid from Paramount in the coming weeks — shareholders currently have until January 8 to decide whether to accept the current offer.

Paramount’s offer, in contrast, was described in the letter as “illusory,” providing “inadequate value,” and likely to impose “numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.” The board said Paramount has “misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family,” and the board also outlined that it doesn’t believe there is a “material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.”

WBD shares dipped in the minutes leading up to the market close on Tuesday after news leaked that its management was preparing to encourage shareholders to reject Paramounts bid, and shares of the HBO parent were down at $28.66, off 0.83% from yesterday’s close, as of 7:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Netflix was ticking higher, up around 1.7%, and Paramount Skydance was modestly in the red, down 1%.

Several outlets have reported that Jared Kushners firm would back out of the group that had been assembled to help finance the Paramount bid. Confirming this withdrawal, a spokesperson for the firm helmed by the president’s son-in-law told NBC News that “the dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

Analysts this month have said that a renewed bidding war for Warner Bros. seems “inevitable” given the antitrust concerns surrounding Netflix’s potential acquisition. President Trump on Tuesday appeared to distance himself from speculation around his closeness to Paramount’s owners, posting on Truth Social, “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Warner’s attempt to influence its shareholders could fuel a higher bid from Paramount in the coming weeks — shareholders currently have until January 8 to decide whether to accept the current offer.

power
Jon Keegan

Senators open investigation into data centers’ effect on consumer utility bills

As Big Tech builds more and more massive data centers in small towns around the country, the public is starting to ask questions about whether they are to blame for rising utility bills.

Today Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) sent letters to the CEOs of some of the biggest builders of data centers: Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, CoreWeave, Digital Realty, and Equinix.

The senators wrote:

“Utility companies have spent billions of dollars updating the electrical grid to accommodate the unprecedented energy demands of AI data centers and appear to recoup the costs by raising residential utility bills. Through these utility price increases, American families bankroll the electricity costs of trillion-dollar tech companies.”

Electricity prices in the US are indeed up, rising 6.2% since last year. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that ratepayers within 50 miles of data centers saw rates increase up to 276% over the past five years.

The companies have until January 12, 2026, to respond to the senators.

The senators wrote:

“Utility companies have spent billions of dollars updating the electrical grid to accommodate the unprecedented energy demands of AI data centers and appear to recoup the costs by raising residential utility bills. Through these utility price increases, American families bankroll the electricity costs of trillion-dollar tech companies.”

Electricity prices in the US are indeed up, rising 6.2% since last year. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that ratepayers within 50 miles of data centers saw rates increase up to 276% over the past five years.

The companies have until January 12, 2026, to respond to the senators.

power
Hyunsoo Rim

TIME names the “Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year for 2025

TIME just announced its Person of the Year… and it’s not a single person.  

The magazine selected the “Architects of AI” as its 2025 honoree, spotlighting the executives and engineers behind the year’s AI boom. One of the two covers features eight tech leaders perched on a steel beam — recreating the iconic “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper” photo from 1932 — including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, AMD’s Lisa Su, xAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the center, whose chips power many of today’s AI models.

Western Auctioneer with Two Fingers up and Gavel in Hand

As investors pick sides in Netflix vs. Paramount, analysts say a renewed Warner Bros. bidding war looks inevitable

Analysts at Bloomberg on Wednesday said Paramount’s WBD hostile takeover offer could go as high as $35 per share.

Netflix WBD CEOs

The Netflix-Warner Bros. deal now faces a wall of opposition

Netflix will owe Warner Bros. $5.8 billion in cash if the deal is terminated on antitrust grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.