Power
FTC Chair Lina Khan
FTC Chair Lina Khan (Bastien Inzaurralde/AFP via Getty Images)

FTC chair races to finish crackdown on creepy location-data brokers

The agency announced settlements with Mobilewalla and Gravy Analytics for selling sensitive consumer-location data without consent.

Jon Keegan

In a pair of statements today, the Federal Trade Commission announced settlements with two more data brokers over their sale of sensitive location data: Mobilewalla and Gravy Analytics (and its subsidiary Venntel). These latest settlements come after several FTC enforcement actions against location-data brokers including Kochava, X-Mode, and InMarket.

The FTC crackdown on location data has focused on companies that collect or aggregate consumers’ location data without explicit consent from sensitive locations, including medical providers’ offices, houses of worship, military installations, and schools.

Time is running out for FTC Chair Lina Khan to wrap up the agency’s pending work, as her term is coming to an end. President-elect Trump will likely place a more business-friendly leader for the agency, as he moves to roll back regulations across many industries.

Shortly after Election Day, Senator Ted Cruz, the Republican ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, sent a letter to Lina Khan warning her that “any controversial FTC action taken up or continued after November 5th will receive particular scrutiny.”

Gravy Analytics and Venntel

In today’s proposed order, Gravy Analytics and Venntel are prohibited from “selling, disclosing, or using sensitive location data in any product or service, and must establish a sensitive data location program,” according to the FTC’s press release. The companies were sued by the FTC for collecting location data via “geofences,” which are virtual lines drawn around buildings “to identify and sell lists of consumers who attended certain events related to medical conditions and places of worship,” as well as additional lists associating people through other sensitive information.

Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a press release:

“Surreptitious surveillance by data brokers undermines our civil liberties and puts servicemembers, union workers, religious minorities, and others at risk. This is the FTC’s fourth action taken this year challenging the sale of sensitive location data, and it’s past time for the industry to get serious about protecting Americans’ privacy.”

Sherwood reached out to Gravy Analytics and Unacast (the parent company), but the email bounced back.

Mobilewalla

Mobilewalla will be banned from selling sensitive location data and will be required to only use consumer data for online auctions, according to the proposed order. Mobilewalla does not collect this data directly from consumers, but rather aggregates and “enriches” consumer data with data collected from advertising real-time bidding exchanges, which often include a phone’s precise location.

Real-time bidding data is only supposed to be used for placing mobile ads via split-second auctions, but because there aren’t any rules covering the misuse of this data, many location-data companies harvest this fire hose of data for peoples’ movements. Importantly, this location data is not controlled by your phones’ location settings, but rather inferred from your IP address, which is tied to the network youre connected to. The FTC notes that this is the first time the agency has flagged this practice as illegal under the law.

“Mobilewalla exploited vulnerabilities in digital ad markets to harvest this data at a stunning scale. The FTC is cracking down on firms that unlawfully exploit people’s sensitive location data and ensuring that we protect Americans from unchecked surveillance,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in the press release.

Laurie Hood, a spokesperson for Mobilewalla, said in an email:

Mobilewalla respects consumer privacy and has been evolving our privacy protections throughout our history as a company. While we disagree with many of the FTC’s allegations and implications that Mobilewalla tracks and targets individuals based on sensitive categories, we are satisfied that the resolution will allow us to continue providing valuable insights to businesses in a manner that respects and protects consumer privacy.”

Aside from these enforcement actions, the location data industry — estimated to be a $12 billion market — has operated with little oversight and few restrictions on who can purchase this data, which in many cases can easily be used to identify individuals’ precise movements. The Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, set off alarms in the privacy world, as readily available location data could be used to prosecute people seeking reproductive healthcare. The decision also spurred Congress to investigate the data-collection practices of the industry.

US law-enforcement agencies have repeatedly purchased this data, effectively bypassing the approval of the courts and the need to obtain search warrants, which traditionally would be required.

More Power

See all Power
power

Warner Bros. Discovery’s board tells shareholders to turn down Paramount’s “inadequate” hostile bid

Warner Bros. Discovery has told shareholders to reject Paramount’s hostile takeover bid, with the company releasing a statement early Wednesday urging shareholders to take the Netflix offer on the table. WBD’s board of directors said the outcome of the Netflix deal is “extraordinary by any measure.”

Paramount’s offer, in contrast, was described in the letter as “illusory,” providing “inadequate value,” and likely to impose “numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.” The board said Paramount has “misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family,” and the board also outlined that it doesn’t believe there is a “material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.”

WBD shares dipped in the minutes leading up to the market close on Tuesday after news leaked that its management was preparing to encourage shareholders to reject Paramounts bid, and shares of the HBO parent were down at $28.66, off 0.83% from yesterday’s close, as of 7:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Netflix was ticking higher, up around 1.7%, and Paramount Skydance was modestly in the red, down 1%.

Several outlets have reported that Jared Kushners firm would back out of the group that had been assembled to help finance the Paramount bid. Confirming this withdrawal, a spokesperson for the firm helmed by the president’s son-in-law told NBC News that “the dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

Analysts this month have said that a renewed bidding war for Warner Bros. seems “inevitable” given the antitrust concerns surrounding Netflix’s potential acquisition. President Trump on Tuesday appeared to distance himself from speculation around his closeness to Paramount’s owners, posting on Truth Social, “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Warner’s attempt to influence its shareholders could fuel a higher bid from Paramount in the coming weeks — shareholders currently have until January 8 to decide whether to accept the current offer.

Paramount’s offer, in contrast, was described in the letter as “illusory,” providing “inadequate value,” and likely to impose “numerous, significant risks and costs on WBD.” The board said Paramount has “misled WBD shareholders that its proposed transaction has a ‘full backstop’ from the Ellison family,” and the board also outlined that it doesn’t believe there is a “material difference in regulatory risk between the PSKY offer and the Netflix merger.”

WBD shares dipped in the minutes leading up to the market close on Tuesday after news leaked that its management was preparing to encourage shareholders to reject Paramounts bid, and shares of the HBO parent were down at $28.66, off 0.83% from yesterday’s close, as of 7:56 a.m. ET on Wednesday. Netflix was ticking higher, up around 1.7%, and Paramount Skydance was modestly in the red, down 1%.

Several outlets have reported that Jared Kushners firm would back out of the group that had been assembled to help finance the Paramount bid. Confirming this withdrawal, a spokesperson for the firm helmed by the president’s son-in-law told NBC News that “the dynamics ​of the investment have changed significantly ​since we initially became ​involved ​in October.”

Analysts this month have said that a renewed bidding war for Warner Bros. seems “inevitable” given the antitrust concerns surrounding Netflix’s potential acquisition. President Trump on Tuesday appeared to distance himself from speculation around his closeness to Paramount’s owners, posting on Truth Social, “If they are friends, I’d hate to see my enemies!”

Warner’s attempt to influence its shareholders could fuel a higher bid from Paramount in the coming weeks — shareholders currently have until January 8 to decide whether to accept the current offer.

power
Jon Keegan

Senators open investigation into data centers’ effect on consumer utility bills

As Big Tech builds more and more massive data centers in small towns around the country, the public is starting to ask questions about whether they are to blame for rising utility bills.

Today Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) sent letters to the CEOs of some of the biggest builders of data centers: Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, CoreWeave, Digital Realty, and Equinix.

The senators wrote:

“Utility companies have spent billions of dollars updating the electrical grid to accommodate the unprecedented energy demands of AI data centers and appear to recoup the costs by raising residential utility bills. Through these utility price increases, American families bankroll the electricity costs of trillion-dollar tech companies.”

Electricity prices in the US are indeed up, rising 6.2% since last year. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that ratepayers within 50 miles of data centers saw rates increase up to 276% over the past five years.

The companies have until January 12, 2026, to respond to the senators.

The senators wrote:

“Utility companies have spent billions of dollars updating the electrical grid to accommodate the unprecedented energy demands of AI data centers and appear to recoup the costs by raising residential utility bills. Through these utility price increases, American families bankroll the electricity costs of trillion-dollar tech companies.”

Electricity prices in the US are indeed up, rising 6.2% since last year. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that ratepayers within 50 miles of data centers saw rates increase up to 276% over the past five years.

The companies have until January 12, 2026, to respond to the senators.

power
Hyunsoo Rim

TIME names the “Architects of AI” as its Person of the Year for 2025

TIME just announced its Person of the Year… and it’s not a single person.  

The magazine selected the “Architects of AI” as its 2025 honoree, spotlighting the executives and engineers behind the year’s AI boom. One of the two covers features eight tech leaders perched on a steel beam — recreating the iconic “Lunch Atop a Skyscraper” photo from 1932 — including Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, AMD’s Lisa Su, xAI’s Elon Musk, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang at the center, whose chips power many of today’s AI models.

Western Auctioneer with Two Fingers up and Gavel in Hand

As investors pick sides in Netflix vs. Paramount, analysts say a renewed Warner Bros. bidding war looks inevitable

Analysts at Bloomberg on Wednesday said Paramount’s WBD hostile takeover offer could go as high as $35 per share.

Netflix WBD CEOs

The Netflix-Warner Bros. deal now faces a wall of opposition

Netflix will owe Warner Bros. $5.8 billion in cash if the deal is terminated on antitrust grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.