Power
FTC Chair Lina Khan
FTC Chair Lina Khan (Bastien Inzaurralde/AFP via Getty Images)

FTC chair races to finish crackdown on creepy location-data brokers

The agency announced settlements with Mobilewalla and Gravy Analytics for selling sensitive consumer-location data without consent.

Jon Keegan

In a pair of statements today, the Federal Trade Commission announced settlements with two more data brokers over their sale of sensitive location data: Mobilewalla and Gravy Analytics (and its subsidiary Venntel). These latest settlements come after several FTC enforcement actions against location-data brokers including Kochava, X-Mode, and InMarket.

The FTC crackdown on location data has focused on companies that collect or aggregate consumers’ location data without explicit consent from sensitive locations, including medical providers’ offices, houses of worship, military installations, and schools.

Time is running out for FTC Chair Lina Khan to wrap up the agency’s pending work, as her term is coming to an end. President-elect Trump will likely place a more business-friendly leader for the agency, as he moves to roll back regulations across many industries.

Shortly after Election Day, Senator Ted Cruz, the Republican ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, sent a letter to Lina Khan warning her that “any controversial FTC action taken up or continued after November 5th will receive particular scrutiny.”

Gravy Analytics and Venntel

In today’s proposed order, Gravy Analytics and Venntel are prohibited from “selling, disclosing, or using sensitive location data in any product or service, and must establish a sensitive data location program,” according to the FTC’s press release. The companies were sued by the FTC for collecting location data via “geofences,” which are virtual lines drawn around buildings “to identify and sell lists of consumers who attended certain events related to medical conditions and places of worship,” as well as additional lists associating people through other sensitive information.

Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a press release:

“Surreptitious surveillance by data brokers undermines our civil liberties and puts servicemembers, union workers, religious minorities, and others at risk. This is the FTC’s fourth action taken this year challenging the sale of sensitive location data, and it’s past time for the industry to get serious about protecting Americans’ privacy.”

Sherwood reached out to Gravy Analytics and Unacast (the parent company), but the email bounced back.

Mobilewalla

Mobilewalla will be banned from selling sensitive location data and will be required to only use consumer data for online auctions, according to the proposed order. Mobilewalla does not collect this data directly from consumers, but rather aggregates and “enriches” consumer data with data collected from advertising real-time bidding exchanges, which often include a phone’s precise location.

Real-time bidding data is only supposed to be used for placing mobile ads via split-second auctions, but because there aren’t any rules covering the misuse of this data, many location-data companies harvest this fire hose of data for peoples’ movements. Importantly, this location data is not controlled by your phones’ location settings, but rather inferred from your IP address, which is tied to the network youre connected to. The FTC notes that this is the first time the agency has flagged this practice as illegal under the law.

“Mobilewalla exploited vulnerabilities in digital ad markets to harvest this data at a stunning scale. The FTC is cracking down on firms that unlawfully exploit people’s sensitive location data and ensuring that we protect Americans from unchecked surveillance,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said in the press release.

Laurie Hood, a spokesperson for Mobilewalla, said in an email:

Mobilewalla respects consumer privacy and has been evolving our privacy protections throughout our history as a company. While we disagree with many of the FTC’s allegations and implications that Mobilewalla tracks and targets individuals based on sensitive categories, we are satisfied that the resolution will allow us to continue providing valuable insights to businesses in a manner that respects and protects consumer privacy.”

Aside from these enforcement actions, the location data industry — estimated to be a $12 billion market — has operated with little oversight and few restrictions on who can purchase this data, which in many cases can easily be used to identify individuals’ precise movements. The Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, set off alarms in the privacy world, as readily available location data could be used to prosecute people seeking reproductive healthcare. The decision also spurred Congress to investigate the data-collection practices of the industry.

US law-enforcement agencies have repeatedly purchased this data, effectively bypassing the approval of the courts and the need to obtain search warrants, which traditionally would be required.

More Power

See all Power
power
Jon Keegan

Anthropic donates $20 million to pro-AI regulation PAC

The war to build a better AI model may be mostly happening in Silicon Valley, but now another important front has opened: Washington, DC.

Anthropic announced a $20 million donation to Public First Action, a new super PAC that advocates for AI policies and regulations that prioritize public safety. The PAC describes itself as “a counterforce that will defend the public interest against those who aim to buy their way out of sensible rule-making.”

The move is seen as a counter to OpenAI’s growing investments in PACs that argue for less AI regulation.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

OpenAI recently donated to Leading the Future PAC, which has received over $50 million from the family of OpenAI president and cofounder Greg Brockman, and the VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The PAC says it is focused on “identifying, maintaining, and growing pro-AI candidates in order to support an AI innovation policy agenda at the state and federal level.”

OpenAI’s Brockman and his wife, Anna, recently donated a total of $25 million to the pro-Trump MAGA, INC. PAC.

power

Looking into its Warner Bros. acquisition, the DOJ probes Netflix for anticompetitive tactics

As the Department of Justice probes Netflix’s proposed $83 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, it has reportedly subpoenaed at least one other entertainment company to investigate whether the streamer has taken part in anticompetitive behavior.

Netflix said the DOJ is conducting a standard review and it expects its acquisition to be approved.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

Per Wall Street Journal reporting, the DOJ is also seeking out information on how Paramount’s proposed acquisition could harm competition in the entertainment industry.

Netflix has argued that its acquisition of WBD would not be anticompetitive, as there is an 80% overlap in Netflix and HBO Max subscribers. The company has said it competes not just with streaming services but also with broader content platforms like YouTube and TikTok for attention. Netflix booked $45.2 billion in revenue in 2025, compared to YouTube’s $60 billion.

The streamer has repeatedly said it will stick to a 45-day theatrical release window for Warner Bros. films. Movie theater trade groups have pointed out that after theatrical release, many films move to premium video on-demand (PVOD), where they can be digitally rented or purchased for several more weeks or months before moving to streaming (subscription video on-demand, or SVOD). According to Cinema United, the average SVOD window for major theatrical films is 102 days, significantly longer than the potential 45-day window for Netflix.

power

Report: Meta pouring $65 million into PACs backing pro-AI state candidates

With a pro-tech, pro-AI administration in Washington, DC, Meta has decided the next battlegrounds that it needs to flood with cash are in individual states.

Starting in Meta’s home state of California, the tech giant is pledging $65 million to a pair of super PACs that it created to fund pro-tech and pro-AI candidates at the state level, according to a report from Politico.

Meta has funded the American Technology Excellence Project ($45 million) and Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California ($20 million) to push back on what it sees as burdensome AI regulations coming from state legislatures.

The META California PAC will support tech-friendly candidates regardless of party.

Starting in Meta’s home state of California, the tech giant is pledging $65 million to a pair of super PACs that it created to fund pro-tech and pro-AI candidates at the state level, according to a report from Politico.

Meta has funded the American Technology Excellence Project ($45 million) and Mobilizing Economic Transformation Across (META) California ($20 million) to push back on what it sees as burdensome AI regulations coming from state legislatures.

The META California PAC will support tech-friendly candidates regardless of party.

TrumpRx

When is TrumpRx launching?

Not on schedule, for one thing.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.