Tech
Data tunnel
(Getty Images)

AI is eating the startup world

Venture capitalists splurged $110 billion on AI startups last year.

Increasingly, the due diligence for getting an ambitious world-changing technology business funded starts with a simple question: how does it use AI?

If the answer is it doesn’t, don’t expect the global gatekeepers of startup capital to go out of their way to write you a check. According to new data out this week from analytics firm Dealroom, the AI funding frenzy continued at pace last year with ~$110 billion pouring into the sector globally, about 33% of the total investment in the entire VC space.

This figure included outsized funding rounds like AI’s poster child OpenAI raking in $6.6 billion and AI data-processing platform Databricks with an even more staggering $10 billion.

AI VC investment
Sherwood News

But the boom isn’t just limited to more established, later-stage companies. Even at the very earliest stages of the venture capital funding ladder — seed and pre-seed stages — the omnipresence of AI is staggering.

AI: In everything, everywhere, all at once

Last year we wrote about how Y Combinator — the world’s preeminent startup accelerator that has backed Airbnb, Reddit, and Stripe — was seeing an overwhelming influx of founders and startups working in AI.

Indeed, data from Y Combinator reveals that some 80% of the companies in its Startup Directory last year had “AI” in either the company name or description of what it does. Just five years ago, that proportion was only 15%.

Y Combinator proportion of startups with “AI” in name or description chart
Sherwood News

Clearly, there are multiple factors at play. Some are straightforward:

  • AI is progressing on a weekly or even daily basis, creating new opportunities for entrepreneurs to use AI as a tool in almost every industry.

Some are a bit more cynical, like FOMO, signaling, or playing the odds:

  • VC investors don’t want to miss out on the boom, with some blindly backing almost anything AI-adjacent.

  • Startup founders know that AI is the hot thing now, and are finding ways to incorporate it into their products... no matter what their original product idea was.

Winners and losers

Venture capital investing is inherently a high-risk endeavor. The typical model for a VC fund follows a power law and requires that one or two breakout mega-successes pay for the dozens of failures.

That law will undoubtedly play out again in the AI space. Most of the startups will fail as they scramble to figure out a viable business model. And raising billions isn’t always enough — Inflection AI, for one, made no money and had to fold its original generative-AI business even after raising $1.5 billion. Even the tech giants, like Meta, admitted earlier last year that the company is “scaling the product before it is making money,” pledging to spend up to $65 billion on AI this year.

Ultimately, it’s still unclear to almost everyone exactly where in the value chain the profit pools will finally accumulate. Will the infrastructure and chip providers like Nvidia be the ultimate winners? Or will it be the creators of the foundational models like OpenAI, Meta, or Alphabet? What about the downstream effects? Will Duolingo, a language-learning app, become completely obsolete because AI will provide perfect translation in real time? Or will AI enable Duolingo to build more powerful tools than ever before?

It’s still too early to tell, which is why the VC market has exploded in almost every vertical, even after the end of the global zero-interest rate era. After a record year in 2021, the VC world rightsized in 2022 and 2023 before a 30% jump in total capital raised last year, thanks primarily to a 62% growth in AI-related venture capital, while investments in the rest of tech fell 12%. VC investors can’t hang around on the sidelines.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Tom Jones

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26
tech
Jon Keegan

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.