Tech
tech

A direct appeal to Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet, to please fix Google Finance’s most basic feature

Alphabet is a remarkable entity. Today, millions of people will fire up Google Chrome, check their Gmail, and then flick over to YouTube — now the biggest thing in TV, and potentially worth some $550 billion — all while Alphabet’s self-driving car division, Waymo, safely delivers thousands of people to their desired destination... and Google itself handles over 150,000 search queries every single second.

But one tiny bug in the Finance product is enough to make me forget all of that.

Disclaimer: If you aren’t in the mood to dive into a very petty — largely unimportant — gripe about stock charts, please stop reading.

When searching the web for a stock and using Google Finance’s “year to date” return function on its interactive module, the calculation is always, bafflingly, wrong. Take Tesla’s stock as an example.

Tesla stock
Sherwood News

Per this Google module, Tesla’s stock is down 31.67% this year. From memory that sounds broadly correct — Tesla is having a bad year after all — but it’s not quite right.

Let’s do the calculation manually. Using the interactive chart, we can calculate the change from the end of December 31 to yesterday’s close (March 31).

Tesla YTD 2 Google Finance
Screenshot from Google

Doing that, we get -35.83%. About a 4% difference.

So, what’s going on?

It turns out that Google Finance is using the close price from January 2 in the first case, essentially ignoring the first day of trading. We can see this in the below screenshot: drawing a line from January 2 to March 31 gives us Google’s YTD change of 31.67%. But, of course, January 2 should be counted. In this case, Tesla moved quite a bit on the day!

Tesla YTD 3 Google Finance
Screenshot from Google

Rival provider Yahoo Finance correctly tells us it’s -35.83% on its website.

Yahoo Finance
Screenshot from Yahoo Finance

The weirdest thing, however, is that if I navigate to the actual Google Finance website (rather than just using the interactive module that appears at the top of Google Search), the problem fixes itself.

Still, Sundar, if you’re reading this, can you help us out here?

When searching the web for a stock and using Google Finance’s “year to date” return function on its interactive module, the calculation is always, bafflingly, wrong. Take Tesla’s stock as an example.

Tesla stock
Sherwood News

Per this Google module, Tesla’s stock is down 31.67% this year. From memory that sounds broadly correct — Tesla is having a bad year after all — but it’s not quite right.

Let’s do the calculation manually. Using the interactive chart, we can calculate the change from the end of December 31 to yesterday’s close (March 31).

Tesla YTD 2 Google Finance
Screenshot from Google

Doing that, we get -35.83%. About a 4% difference.

So, what’s going on?

It turns out that Google Finance is using the close price from January 2 in the first case, essentially ignoring the first day of trading. We can see this in the below screenshot: drawing a line from January 2 to March 31 gives us Google’s YTD change of 31.67%. But, of course, January 2 should be counted. In this case, Tesla moved quite a bit on the day!

Tesla YTD 3 Google Finance
Screenshot from Google

Rival provider Yahoo Finance correctly tells us it’s -35.83% on its website.

Yahoo Finance
Screenshot from Yahoo Finance

The weirdest thing, however, is that if I navigate to the actual Google Finance website (rather than just using the interactive module that appears at the top of Google Search), the problem fixes itself.

Still, Sundar, if you’re reading this, can you help us out here?

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Report: Anthropic cuts off xAI’s access to its models for coding

Competition between the top AI companies is fierce. Top employees are being poached, and companies are training their AI on competitors’ models to stay ahead of the pack.

Anthropic is taking steps to make sure it’s not helping the competition in any way. According to tech reporter Kylie Robison, this week Anthropic cut access to xAI developers who were using its Claude models for coding via the popular Cursor AI coding tool.

Robison reports that xAI cofounder Tony Wu told his team in an email:
“This is a both bad and good news. We will get a hit on productivity, but it rly pushes us to develop our own coding product / models.”

Robison reports that xAI cofounder Tony Wu told his team in an email:
“This is a both bad and good news. We will get a hit on productivity, but it rly pushes us to develop our own coding product / models.”

tech

xAI’s revenue is growing, but so are its staggering losses

Good news: xAI’s revenue nearly doubled to $107 million in the third quarter compared to the second.

Bad news: Its net losses grew to $1.46 billion in Q3, up from $1 billion in the first quarter, and more than 13x revenue, Bloomberg reports.

The company, which is currently worth north of $230 billion, is burning through staggering amounts of cash — nearly a billion dollars a month — in service of building data centers and developing what it calls “self-sufficient” AI that can one day power robots like Tesla’s Optimus. Meanwhile, its revenue still looks more like that of a midsize startup than a tech giant.

Despite receiving more yes than no votes, Tesla’s board didn’t approve a shareholder proposal to invest in xAI, leaving a more formal relationship between the companies unresolved, even as xAI continues to burn cash at a pace that will require steady access to outside capital.

Of course, Elon Musk’s AI company is already deeply financially intertwined with his EV company. In 2024, xAI spent nearly $200 million, largely on Tesla Megapack batteries — a figure that appears to have grown significantly in 2025.

The company, which is currently worth north of $230 billion, is burning through staggering amounts of cash — nearly a billion dollars a month — in service of building data centers and developing what it calls “self-sufficient” AI that can one day power robots like Tesla’s Optimus. Meanwhile, its revenue still looks more like that of a midsize startup than a tech giant.

Despite receiving more yes than no votes, Tesla’s board didn’t approve a shareholder proposal to invest in xAI, leaving a more formal relationship between the companies unresolved, even as xAI continues to burn cash at a pace that will require steady access to outside capital.

Of course, Elon Musk’s AI company is already deeply financially intertwined with his EV company. In 2024, xAI spent nearly $200 million, largely on Tesla Megapack batteries — a figure that appears to have grown significantly in 2025.

tech

Apple’s hardware chief is the front-runner to be the next CEO

The New York Times is the latest news organization to cite Apple sources who think the company’s hardware chief, John Ternus, will be the one to fill CEO Tim Cook’s shoes. Citing people close to Apple, the publication reports that Cook is “tired and would like to reduce his workload” and that 50-year-old Ternus is the most likely to take his place, as the company accelerates its succession planning.

The Times is in good company. Both the Financial Times and Bloomberg have previously said Ternus is the top pick to succeed Cook at the helm of the tech giant, and Ternus is currently enjoying the top spot on prediction markets. His market-implied odds of being the next CEO are currently above 60% on both Polymarket and Kalshi event contracts.

The Times is in good company. Both the Financial Times and Bloomberg have previously said Ternus is the top pick to succeed Cook at the helm of the tech giant, and Ternus is currently enjoying the top spot on prediction markets. His market-implied odds of being the next CEO are currently above 60% on both Polymarket and Kalshi event contracts.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.