Tech
Scissors
(Getty Images)

Eat rocks and run with scissors — Google’s AI Overviews are wild

From getting basic US history wrong to surfacing racist conspiracy theories, the results are not encouraging.

Earlier this month Google began rolling out its AI Overview feature to the masses — and it’s going poorly.

Google, in some instances, has been using generative AI to answer questions at the top of people’s searches, rather than surface relavent links there and show tidbits of that information like it used to. The responses are direct and in plain language, offering an air of authority. The problem is when you “let Google do the Googling for you” the results can be at best hilarious and at worst out-right dangerous.

A Google spokesperson told me these errors come from “generally very uncommon queries, and aren’t representative of most people’s experiences.” But that doesn’t acknowledge just how widely and wildly Google Search is used. “We conducted extensive testing before launching this new experience, and will use these isolated examples as we continue to refine our systems overall,” the spokesperson said.

Naturally, people have been having a field day seeing just how bad the AI’s responses can be. Here are some fun and scary examples of Google’s AI Overview gone wrong that I’ve been able to confirm are real:

Apparently people should “eat at least one small rock a day” (it told me ingesting “pea gravel slowly” was fine), which suggests it’s pulling answers from satire magazine The Onion. Apparently it also said that the CIA uses black highlighters, which would have come from this Onion story, but I wasn’t able to replicate that. Google didn’t respond to a question about whether it trained its AI on The Onion.

Here’s AI Overview telling me running with scissors is just fine!

“Should you run with scissors”

It said president Barack Obama is Muslim, a known conspiracy theory. Google told me they’ve since taken this down since they said it violates their policies.

It suggested many US presidents have been non-white. This bears some similarity to Google’s ill-fated “woke” image generator that showed Black founding fathers and Nazis. Google subsequently paused the feature.

It suggested adding glue to get the cheese to stick to pizza, a result apparently pulled directly from an 11-year-old Reddit post. Google pays Reddit $60 million a year to use its content.

It said there’s no country in Africa that starts with a “K.” Sorry Kenya!

It is bad at spelling fruit.

fruits that end in um

Google’s AI Overview also says that Google violates antitrust law. However, the “yes” here actually goes on to say “yes, the U.S. Justice Department and 11 states are suing Google for antitrust violations.” This is partly true but actually doesn't add there is a second, near-identical lawsuit involving 35 states.

Google has shut off AI Overview for many of these queries after they went viral.

“Our systems aim to automatically prevent policy-violating content from appearing in AI Overviews,” the Google spokesperson said. “If policy-violating content does appear, we will take action as appropriate.”

For now it seems like a game of Whac-A-Mole. Google didn’t respond to a question about whether they’d keep the AI Overview feature up and running.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Jefferies downgrades Apple to “underperform,” calls iPhone sales expectations “excessive”

Sure, Apple’s latest iPhone is selling better than some previous models, but that’s already reflected in the stock, Jefferies analysts wrote in a note today. In it they downgraded the stock to “underperform” and kept the price target roughly flat at $205.

The analysts argue the sales bump stems from high trade-in values and the lack of price hikes, rather than “new form factor or tech innovations.” As we recently noted, it could also have something to do with a natural upgrade cycle rather than consumers going nuts over NITS.

The analysts say the positive sales momentum for the iPhone 17 has engendered “excessive expectations” for the replacement cycle as well as for the company’s upcoming foldable iPhone.

“We do not doubt AAPL will be able to make the most beautiful foldable phone in the market, but the question is the TAM [total addressable market] of a US$2K phone,” they wrote.

tech

JPMorgan reiterates “underweight” rating after Tesla delivery beat

While Tesla delivered a massive delivery beat yesterday, JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman wants to remind investors to put that beat into context:

  1. He noted that the surge was likely a temporary one thanks to pulled-forward demand by consumers hoping to capitalize on the $7,500 tax credit that ended September 30. That pull forward will necessarily mean fewer purchases later, and the end of the tax credit “ultimately will negatively impact Tesla deliveries as soon as October 1.” He added that the analyst consensus still expects Tesla’s full-year sales to decline.

  2. Tesla’s beat, Brinkman said, was in part due to analysts having dramatically lowered their previous estimates amid falling sales. While the nearly 500,000 deliveries in Q3 were about 12% higher than the analyst consensus right before the numbers came out, he noted that analyst expectations have been grinding lower for years. He pointed out that Street estimates for Q3 2025 deliveries peaked at 1.1 million in 2022. While the company missed that peak estimate by 56%, the stock is up 81% in the intervening years.

JPMorgan raised its third-quarter earnings-per-share and free cash flow estimates on the delivery numbers, but reiterated its “underweight” rating for the stock.

tech

OpenAI’s Sora has bumped Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s ChatGPT from the top of the App Store

OpenAI’s AI-only social media app, Sora, launched three days ago and is already No. 1 on the US free App Store, where it has displaced regular favorite AI apps Gemini from Google and ChatGPT, OpenAI’s main app. It’s an especially impressive feat given that for now the highly addictive, legally murky app is invite-only.

Of course, many a buzzy app has surged up the App Store ranks only to fizzle over time. We’ll see what happens with Sora.

tech

OpenAI’s hot Sora video app is a copyright lawsuit waiting to happen

OpenAI has generated some serious buzz surrounding its new Sora video generation app. The app is currently No. 3 on the iOS free app leaderboards, even though it’s invitation-only for the time being.

But users have been flooding social media with videos generated by Sora, and in addition to a “Skibidi Toilet” Sam Altman and the OpenAI CEO dressed as a Nazi, the app is able to create videos featuring iconic characters from Disney, Nintendo, and Paramount Skydance.

On the system card for the Sora 2 AI model (which powers the Sora app), OpenAI says it was trained on things found on the internet:

“Sora 2 was trained on diverse datasets, including information that is publicly available on the internet, information that we partner with third parties to access, and information that our users or human trainers and researchers provide or generate.”

This seems like an invitation for a big copyright lawsuit, along the lines of the one Disney, Dreamworks, and NBCUniversal recently filed against AI image generator Midjourney.

But OpenAI is trying to flip the responsibility of protecting copyrighted material to the intellectual property owners themselves. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is allowing copyrighted material in Sora by default, unless copyright holders opt out of the service.

The courts will have to decide if this novel approach to intellectual copyright law works, but government regulators may not be that big of a problem, as Altman has made sure OpenAI is in the good graces of the Trump administration. If OpenAI has to pay up to copyright holders after a lawsuit, what’s a few billion dollars here or there when you’re raising so much capital?

On the system card for the Sora 2 AI model (which powers the Sora app), OpenAI says it was trained on things found on the internet:

“Sora 2 was trained on diverse datasets, including information that is publicly available on the internet, information that we partner with third parties to access, and information that our users or human trainers and researchers provide or generate.”

This seems like an invitation for a big copyright lawsuit, along the lines of the one Disney, Dreamworks, and NBCUniversal recently filed against AI image generator Midjourney.

But OpenAI is trying to flip the responsibility of protecting copyrighted material to the intellectual property owners themselves. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is allowing copyrighted material in Sora by default, unless copyright holders opt out of the service.

The courts will have to decide if this novel approach to intellectual copyright law works, but government regulators may not be that big of a problem, as Altman has made sure OpenAI is in the good graces of the Trump administration. If OpenAI has to pay up to copyright holders after a lawsuit, what’s a few billion dollars here or there when you’re raising so much capital?

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.