(Bronson Stamp for Sherwood Media)

OpenAI is Adobe

Software that threatens to change the way art is made.

Sophia Smith Galer

12/26/24 7:00AM

Few in the creative industries can work without relying on Adobe. It would be like an electrician without a toolbox, except an electrician owns their tools and doesn’t have to spend $60 a month for the privilege of opening it.

Since it was founded in the 1980s, Adobe has slowly Pac-Man-glomped almost every weapon in the modern creative arsenal. Want to template something? Use InDesign. Want to draw something? There’s Photoshop. Want to film something? You won’t earn the big bucks without Premiere Pro or After Effects. Adobe has been the ultimate generative assistant — until now. For now we’ve been graced with the presence of OpenAI, and its threat to creativity is dire.

The job of the extensive Adobe suite was always to support an artist or filmmaker — vocations that increasingly demand dexterity across editing, designing, and filming — in working more quickly and making higher-quality work. In swoops OpenAI’s era-changing product, ChatGPT, which is not only ready to make creatives more efficient but is also capable of generating ideas for them. Adobe only ever brought you the software for creating your work. It was always up to you to bring the artistic genius, and you were expected to learn the requisite skills over time or through a degree. Now, the electrician get their toolbox from ChatGPT, but they can also get their yearslong electrical training.

With great power comes great copyright infringement. In exchange for the limitless pool of ideas ChatGPT seems to offer, creatives have been forced to donate their own innate skills, robbed of them by training datasets fed into rapacious large language models. Artists are rightly angry about this, and as Adobe amps up its own generative-AI efforts to tackle ChatGPT’s competition, users have protested against perceived invasions of their privacy and ownership as much as their creative process. This is likely to explode once OpenAI’s video tool, Sora, opens up to widespread adoption. Video specialists have been largely protected from AI generation, as deepfakes continue to look uncannily amateur and AI videos tank on social-media algorithms, but Sora may just disrupt that — as well as their careers.

None of this frustration or injustice will stop ChatGPT from becoming what Adobe has been for decades: an industry standard in the creative fields. Résumés of the past were decorated with an ever-increasing list of Adobe tools the applicant could count in their skill set, but I predict the CVs of the future will see generative-AI platforms like ChatGPT nudge them out of prime position. More and more tools with generative AI across more companies sounds like a competitive, diverse environment, until you realize that you’re paying $300 monthly in software subscriptions alone. Creatives who work for big organizations can put it on the company card, but the smart 22-year-old saddled with student loans will be priced out.

Whether we see new creative GPT monopolies or simply witness Adobe continue to run one, OpenAI threatens to rob creatives of their most important asset: originality.

Read the other arguments for OpenAI's future here.

Sophia Smith Galer is an award-winning journalist, author, and broadcaster.

Chris Stokel-Walker

Bot bias

6/17/26

Companies are getting AI chatbots to smear their competitors

The race to influence AI chatbots is leading to some companies to adopt shady competitive tactics.

Tom Jones6/17/26

Prediction markets have, predictably, been given a boost by the summer of sports

Major platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen huge upticks in users of late, thanks in no small part to what’s felt like a recent sporting smorgasbord, with major competitions across hockey, basketball, and soccer soaking up fans’ time (and spending, clearly) at the outset of summer.

While gaming industry groups may not like it, there’s been a huge change in the methods people are using to put money on the big games, with everyone from fortunate NYC bar owners, to a far less fortunate Spanish supporter, turning to prediction markets to try and turn their sports know-how into cold, hard cash.

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

2026 World Cup Reverses Seasonal Lull for Sports Betting Apps

According to a new report from Adam Blacker for apptopia, that shift might have been even more seismic than imagined in the wake of the NBA and NHL finals and around the 2026 World Cup kicking off.

South by Southwest Conference and Festivals

Gold Tesla Cybercabs are piling up, but they’re not picking up passengers yet

Low-volume production started in April. Now people are noticing them more and more in the wild.

Rani Molla6/15/26

Millie Giles

TAKING ACCOUNTS

6/15/26

Britain announces social media ban for under-16s starting early 2027

The UK government plans to use the same model for the restrictions as Australia — but how successful has that case study been so far?

UK Prime Minister Announces Under-16s Social Media Ban

Jon Keegan6/15/26

Anthropic pulls Fable and Mythos access worldwide after Trump administration bars their use by foreign nationals

Only days after releasing two versions of its next-gen AI model, Anthropic has disabled them for users worldwide.

Anthropic says it received a Friday night order from the Trump administration to suspend access to the models for any foreign national (anywhere in the world) — a group that included some Anthropic employees. In response, the company turned off access to everyone.

Last week, the company released to the public its much-anticipated Claude Fable 5 model (and its restricted version Claude Mythos 5, which is still being tested with trusted partners). Anthropic said in a blog post announcing the action that officials cited national security concerns with the new models, while offering few specific details.

The post said that the government gave the company “verbal evidence of a potential narrow, non-universal jailbreak” of the public Fable 5 model. A jailbreak is a means by which users can evade restrictions built into the code to unlock prohibited functionality. Anthropic downplayed the significance of the attack, and said other major models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, could also be affected by the technique described.

Fears of these first Mythos-class models being misused are running high, after Anthropic warned the cybersecurity world in May that the advanced cyber capabilities of Mythos have rapidly discovered thousands of vulnerabilities in ubiquitous software, leading to the decision to restrict the full version of the model to a close group of trusted partners for testing.

This morning, Axios reported that Anthropic technical staff have flown to Washington to meet with White House officials to resolve the issue.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that the Trump administration’s decision to take action against Anthropic was prompted by discussions that Amazon CEO Andy Jassy had with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. According to the report, Amazon researchers said they had been able to evade some of Fable 5’s security restrictions using specific prompts. Amazon is a major investor in Anthropic.

Anthropic is currently suing the US government to fight the Pentagon’s blacklisting of the company on national security grounds.

Statement on the US government directive to suspend access to Fable 5 and Mythos 5