Tech
Italian Tech Week 2024
Sam Altman, cofounder and CEO of OpenAI (Stefano Guidi/Getty Images)
Weird Money

OpenAI is in the business of making OpenAI employees rich

OpenAI's stock compensation expense showed that its employees were paid between $400,000 and $2,000,000 in average stock comp through the first six months of 2024.

Jack Raines

Since OpenAI closed its massive $6.6 billion funding round that valued the company at $157 billion, I’ve been wondering how they managed to convince investors that the valuation makes sense. The answer, it turns out, was another large number: $100 billion.

Cory Weinberg over at The Information published an interesting piece breaking down OpenAI’s investor pitch for its most recent fundraise, and some of the numbers they showed investors were astounding. Notably:

Revenue: OpenAI expects revenue to scale from an expected ~$4 billion in 2024 to $100 billion in 2029, which would be a ~90% revenue CAGR over the next five years. While revenue growth over the last year has been explosive (monthly revenue for August 2024 was $300 million, up 1700% since early 2023), growth will become more difficult with size. For example, it’s easier to go from ~$180,000 in monthly revenue to $300 million (as OpenAI did) than it would be to grow from $300 million to $510 billion.

Compute Costs: Ignoring all other operating costs such as salaries, general and administrative expenses, and sales and marketing, OpenAI’s compute costs to train and run its models are expected to be $5 billion this year, compared to $4 billion in total revenue.

Stock Compensation: OpenAI reported stock compensation of $1.5 billion in the first half of 2024, which is around its revenue for that period.

This last point is especially interesting. Two weeks ago, I discussed the curious case of OpenAI’s wave of resignations, as at least nine high-level executives had left the company over the last year. At the time, I pointed out one factor that could be influencing these resignations was that long-time OpenAI employees had the opportunity to sell equity in a tender offer for massive returns:

All of the above-mentioned employees have been at OpenAI since at least 2022, when OpenAI was valued at ~$20 billion, and most of them started even earlier, when OpenAI’s valuation was much lower. In February 2024, they were able to sell some of their stakes in a tender offer at an $86 billion valuation. If you were a long-tenured employee at OpenAI, and you took some chips off the table in that tender offer, you’re rich. And not only are you rich, you are a hot commodity in a hot labor market in the hottest sector in technology right now. You would have no problem raising capital for a new startup or getting paid top-dollar to join another AI startup or a big tech company.

The real question is, if you’re already rich, anyone would hire or fund you, and the company you’ve worked at for years has changed its entire mission statement… why would you stay?

The stock-based compensation stat all but confirms that, yes, OpenAI’s employees have been getting p-a-i-d. For context, Nvidia, a $3.3 trillion company with ~30,000 employees, paid $2.2 billion in stock compensation through the first half of 2024. OpenAI, which is worth roughly 5% of Nvidia, paid 68% of Nvidia’s stock compensation. And the compensation per employee is jealousy-inducing.

In November 2023, OpenAI had 770 employees. According to employee contact database RocketReach, OpenAI now has 3,726 employees. With $1.5 billion in stock compensation paid out in the first half of 2024, the average employee earned between $400,000 and $2,000,000 in stock-based compensation in that six-month period, depending on headcount over the course of that period. Additionally, OpenAI’s CFO confirmed that, as with the February tender offer, employees would again be able to sell shares after this funding round. So, no, we shouldn’t be surprised that OpenAI employees are resigning. They’re millionaires with willing buyers of their shares.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Tesla’s 45 Austin Robotaxis now have 14 crashes on the books since launching in June

Since launching in June 2025, Tesla’s 45 Austin Robotaxis have been involved in 14 crashes, per Electrek reporting citing National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data.

Electrek analysis found that the vehicles have traveled roughly 800,000 paid miles in that time period, amounting to a crash every 57,000 miles. According to the NHTSA, US drivers crash once every 500,000 miles on average.

The article says Tesla submitted five new crash reports in January of this year that happened in December and January. Electrek wrote:

“The new crashes include a collision with a fixed object at 17 mph while the vehicle was driving straight, a crash with a bus while the Tesla was stationary, a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.”

Tesla updated a previously reported crash that was originally filed as only having damaged property to include a passenger’s hospitalization.

Last month, Tesla shares climbed after CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X that the company’s Austin Robotaxis had begun operating without a safety monitor.

The article says Tesla submitted five new crash reports in January of this year that happened in December and January. Electrek wrote:

“The new crashes include a collision with a fixed object at 17 mph while the vehicle was driving straight, a crash with a bus while the Tesla was stationary, a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.”

Tesla updated a previously reported crash that was originally filed as only having damaged property to include a passenger’s hospitalization.

Last month, Tesla shares climbed after CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X that the company’s Austin Robotaxis had begun operating without a safety monitor.

tech
Jon Keegan

Ahead of IPO, Anthropic adds veteran executive and former Trump administration official to board

Anthropic is moving to put the pieces in place for a successful IPO this year.

Today, the company announced that Chris Liddel would join its board of directors.

Liddel is an seasoned executive who previously served as CFO for Microsoft, GM, and International Paper.

Liddel also comes with experience in government, having served as the deputy White House chief of staff during the first Trump administration.

Ties to the Trump world could be helpful for Anthropic as it pushes to enter the public market. Its reportedly not on the greatest terms with the current administration, as the startup has pushed back on using its Claude AI for surveillance applications.

Liddel is an seasoned executive who previously served as CFO for Microsoft, GM, and International Paper.

Liddel also comes with experience in government, having served as the deputy White House chief of staff during the first Trump administration.

Ties to the Trump world could be helpful for Anthropic as it pushes to enter the public market. Its reportedly not on the greatest terms with the current administration, as the startup has pushed back on using its Claude AI for surveillance applications.

tech
Rani Molla

Meta is bringing back facial recognition for its smart glasses

Meta is reviving its highly controversial facial recognition efforts, with plans to incorporate the tech into its smart glasses as soon as this year, The New York Times reports.

In 2021, around the time Facebook rebranded as Meta, the company shut down the facial recognition software it had used to tag people in photos, saying it needed to “find the right balance.”

Now, according to an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Meta seems to feel that it’s at least found the right moment, noting that the fraught and crowded political climate could allow the feature to attract less scrutiny.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads.

The tech, called “Name Tag” internally, would let smart glass wearers identify and surface information about people they see with the glasses by using Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

Now, according to an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Meta seems to feel that it’s at least found the right moment, noting that the fraught and crowded political climate could allow the feature to attract less scrutiny.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads.

The tech, called “Name Tag” internally, would let smart glass wearers identify and surface information about people they see with the glasses by using Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.