Tech
Open AI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman
(Kim Jae-Hwan/Getty Images)

OpenAI’s o1-pro is the most expensive AI model in the industry

No other model by a major AI company comes even close.

OpenAI just released the pricing for its o1-pro reasoning model, which draws on an insane amount of computing power to use multistep “reasoning” through problems to get better responses to prompts. This computing power doesn’t come cheap: the new pricing is the highest for any major model in the industry today, and by a lot.

As a regular human user, you can use a lot of AI tools for free, but maybe you pay $20 per month for OpenAI’s ChatGPT Plus or Google’s Gemini Advanced if you use it a lot. But that’s not where the money is.

When companies are hooking their services up to AI platforms behind the scenes via an API (application programming interface), the costs can really add up. So what is the standard unit of measure for AI costs?

API pricing for AI models is measured by how much data (words, images, video, audio) you put into a model and how much data gets spit back out to you. The output costs more than the input.

The common measure for this is 1 million “tokens.” In AI parlance, a “token” is like an atomic unit of data. When text is input into a model, the words and sentences get broken down into these tokens for processing, which could be a few letters. For OpenAI’s models, one token is roughly four characters in English. So a paragraph is about 100 tokens, give or take.

For a million tokens, think Robert Caro’s epic biography of Robert Moses, “The Power Broker” — which I’m currently halfway through — a 2.3-pound, 1,300-page beast of a book. A rough estimate of this tome comes out to about 850,000 tokens.

If you put 1 million tokens into some of the leading models today, you could probably pay for it with just a few coins. For OpenAI GPT-4o Mini, the input would cost you only $0.15, while the output would cost $0.60. Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash would cost you a single penny for the input and $0.04 for the output.

OpenAI o1-pro’s pricing for 1 million tokens of input is $150, and $600 for the output.

In a tweet announcing the pricing, OpenAI wrote, “It uses more compute than o1 to provide consistently better responses.”

It’s worth pointing out that there are huge differences in the capabilities of these models — some are very small and built for specific use cases like running on a mobile device, and others are massive for advanced tasks, so differences in prices are to be expected. But as you can see from the chart, OpenAI’s pricing stands apart from the crowd.

Pricing is a key issue for OpenAI as it struggles to find a viable business model to cover the enormous costs of running these services. The company’s recent pivot to release only “reasoning” models like o1-pro going forward means much higher computing costs, as evidenced by the cost of solving individual ARC-AGI puzzles for $3,400 apiece.

Recently, The Information reported that OpenAI was considering charging $20,000 per month for “PhD-level agents.”

CEO Sam Altman said in January that OpenAI is losing money on its ChatGPT Pro product.

The company is reportedly raising money at a valuation of $340 billion, and in 2024 it was reported to have lost about $5 billion, after bringing in only $3.7 billion in revenue.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech
Jon Keegan

Chinese AI chatbots reportedly must answer 2,000 questions, prove censorship compliance

For American companies building AI today, its basically a free-for-all, a self-regulation zone with zero federal restrictions.

But for Chinese AI companies, the Chinese Communist Party exerts strict control over what models get released and what questions they cannot answer.

A report in The Wall Street Journal details the rigorous tests that AI models are subjected to before being released on the global stage to compete with Western AI models.

AI models must answer 2,000 questions that are frequently updated and achieve a 95% refusal rate for queries related to forbidden topics, like the Tiananmen Square massacre or human rights violations, according to the report.

The strict regulatory framework does have some safety advantages, such as preventing chatbots from sharing violent or pornographic material as well as protections from self-harm, an issue that American AI companies are currently wrestling with.

A report in The Wall Street Journal details the rigorous tests that AI models are subjected to before being released on the global stage to compete with Western AI models.

AI models must answer 2,000 questions that are frequently updated and achieve a 95% refusal rate for queries related to forbidden topics, like the Tiananmen Square massacre or human rights violations, according to the report.

The strict regulatory framework does have some safety advantages, such as preventing chatbots from sharing violent or pornographic material as well as protections from self-harm, an issue that American AI companies are currently wrestling with.

tech

Report: OpenAI has started mocking up what ads in ChatGPT could look like

2025 saw OpenAI ink a flurry of massive deals. To pay for it all, the company has realized that it can’t get there on $20-per-month subscriptions alone; it also needs to monetize its hundreds of millions of free users.

To this end, despite repeatedly denying that ads are coming to ChatGPT, a new report says OpenAI is actually working through all those details.

Citing people familiar with the discussions, The Information reports employees have discussed different ways to prioritize sponsored information in ChatGPT in response to relevant queries.

Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, its offerings have been ad-free, relying instead on a freemium subscription model. But with Google recently telling advertisers it plans to bring ads to Gemini next year, and with OpenAI burning through truckloads of cash, the pressure to follow suit is growing.

OpenAI is looking at its AI model-developing competitors Meta and Google, which are pulling in hundreds of billions of dollars per year in advertising revenue, to arrive at this conclusion. It’s also seemingly inspired by Amazon’s (and Google’s) idea of sponsored product placement.

Per the report, in addition to trying to build new kinds of ad units, OpenAI is considering a few options:

  • Leaning into chats that are clearly about buying a product and giving priority placement to sponsored results — though this works out to only about 2.1% of queries, according to OpenAI.

  • Showing ads based on the treasure trove of information it has on users, by mining their chat histories.

  • A “sponsored” sidebar showing ads related to the conversation.

But the company realizes it has to be careful to not turn off users, who might not trust a chatbot that peppers sensitive conversations with ads.

Citing people familiar with the discussions, The Information reports employees have discussed different ways to prioritize sponsored information in ChatGPT in response to relevant queries.

Since ChatGPT burst onto the scene in late 2022, its offerings have been ad-free, relying instead on a freemium subscription model. But with Google recently telling advertisers it plans to bring ads to Gemini next year, and with OpenAI burning through truckloads of cash, the pressure to follow suit is growing.

OpenAI is looking at its AI model-developing competitors Meta and Google, which are pulling in hundreds of billions of dollars per year in advertising revenue, to arrive at this conclusion. It’s also seemingly inspired by Amazon’s (and Google’s) idea of sponsored product placement.

Per the report, in addition to trying to build new kinds of ad units, OpenAI is considering a few options:

  • Leaning into chats that are clearly about buying a product and giving priority placement to sponsored results — though this works out to only about 2.1% of queries, according to OpenAI.

  • Showing ads based on the treasure trove of information it has on users, by mining their chat histories.

  • A “sponsored” sidebar showing ads related to the conversation.

But the company realizes it has to be careful to not turn off users, who might not trust a chatbot that peppers sensitive conversations with ads.

tech
Rani Molla

NHTSA investigates Tesla Model 3 over concerns mechanical door release is “not readily accessible or easily identifiable”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Wednesday it is investigating the emergency exit controls on 179,071 model year 2022 Tesla Model 3 vehicles after receiving a defect petition alleging the vehicles’ “mechanical door release is hidden, unlabeled, and not intuitive to locate during an emergency.”

The investigation is separate from a probe the agency announced this fall into instances of electronic door handles on 2021 Tesla Model Y vehicles becoming inoperable from the outside.

The action follows a series of reporting from Bloomberg examining the role of Tesla’s door designs in accident fatalities. Tesla has previously said it is working on redesigns to its door handles.

tech
Jon Keegan

FCC bans new Chinese drones and components from DJI and Autel Robotics

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission banned new drones and critical components from the market-leading Chinese drone manufacturer DJI and smaller firm Autel Robotics, calling the foreign-made drones “an unacceptable national security risk.”

The ban covers all drones and related components from any foreign manufacturer. DJI dominates the worldwide (nonmilitary) drone market, with a market share greater than 90%, according to some estimates.

In addition to hobbyists, the quadcopter-style drones made by DJI are used heavily in a wide variety of industries, including agriculture, infrastructure inspection, real estate, and also by first responders. Blocking foreign drones leaves many critical fields without a viable US-made alternative, as the industry has struggled to develop new supply chains that don’t come from China and match the quality of DJI’s hardware and software.

Shares of Florida-based drone builder Unusual Machines are up over 8% in early trading. Donald Trump Jr. is an investor and adviser to the company.

DJI has said its drones do not present a security risk and that it welcomes a national security review, noting that its drones can be used without an internet connection and all data is saved locally.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr said:

“I welcome this Executive Branch national security determination, and I am pleased that the FCC has now added foreign drones and related components, which pose an unacceptable national security risk, to the FCC’s Covered List. Following President Trump’s leadership, the FCC will work closely with U.S. drone makers to unleash American drone dominance.”

The ban covers all drones and related components from any foreign manufacturer. DJI dominates the worldwide (nonmilitary) drone market, with a market share greater than 90%, according to some estimates.

In addition to hobbyists, the quadcopter-style drones made by DJI are used heavily in a wide variety of industries, including agriculture, infrastructure inspection, real estate, and also by first responders. Blocking foreign drones leaves many critical fields without a viable US-made alternative, as the industry has struggled to develop new supply chains that don’t come from China and match the quality of DJI’s hardware and software.

Shares of Florida-based drone builder Unusual Machines are up over 8% in early trading. Donald Trump Jr. is an investor and adviser to the company.

DJI has said its drones do not present a security risk and that it welcomes a national security review, noting that its drones can be used without an internet connection and all data is saved locally.

FCC Chair Brendan Carr said:

“I welcome this Executive Branch national security determination, and I am pleased that the FCC has now added foreign drones and related components, which pose an unacceptable national security risk, to the FCC’s Covered List. Following President Trump’s leadership, the FCC will work closely with U.S. drone makers to unleash American drone dominance.”

tech
Rani Molla

Tesla’s EU sales fell nearly 40% in the first 11 months of 2025

From January through November of this year, Tesla sales fell 39% to 129,000 in the European Union compared with the first 11 months of 2024, according to new data from the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association, known as ACEA. In that same time, sales of Chinese competitor BYD grew 240% to 110,000. BYD first outsold Tesla there this spring, but Tesla is still outpacing BYD for the year.

Overall, sales of battery electric vehicles in the EU rose 28%.

Tesla has struggled throughout this year in Europe, its third-biggest market — something CEO Elon Musk has blamed on Europe’s lack of regulatory approval for its Full Self-Driving tech, though the decline likely has more to do with competition from China.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.