Tech
A newly updated frost-blue Model S
The newly updated Model S, pictured here in a new “frost blue,” costs $5,000 more than previous versions (Tesla)

Tesla promised “more affordable models” in the first half of 2025. Where are they?

Production was supposed to start by the end of June, but there’s been no word on development and Tesla has been releasing more expensive models instead.

In Tesla’s first-quarter earnings report, the company reiterated something it’s been saying for a while: it would be launching its long-awaited lower-cost cars soon.

“Plans for new vehicles, including more affordable models, remain on track for start of production in the first half of 2025. These vehicles will utilize aspects of the next generation platform as well as aspects of our current platforms and will be produced on the same manufacturing lines as our current vehicle lineup.”

On the earnings call in April, when asked about the status of those models, the company’s VP of vehicle engineering, Lars Moravy, said:

“We’re still planning to release models this year. As with all launches, we’re working through like the last-minute issues that pop up... At this point, I would say that the ramp might be a little slower than we had hoped initially, just kind of given the turmoil that exists in the industry right now, but there’s nothing blocking us from starting production within the timeline laid out.”

Moravy also pretty much confirmed what many had suspected: the more affordable models would be stripped-down versions of existing models rather than anything new.

The need for cheaper cars has become especially acute after Telsa canned its long-awaited $25,000 car last year. Big federal tax credits are also likely to go away under the Trump administration, making existing models less affordable. With an aging lineup and low-cost competition eating into the company’s top and bottom lines, the cheaper versions of existing models seemed like a nice middle ground for investors.

But we’re just days from the end of the first half of 2025 and, so far, Tesla has only released more expensive versions of its existing lineup, including a pricier Model Y and, more recently, a Model S and Model X that cost $5,000 more than the originals.

The company hasn’t made any announcements about having begun production on the cheaper lineup — something that would be in the stock’s best interest. Last week, Business Insider reported that the company would shut down production at its Texas factory, where it produces the Model Y and Cybertruck, for the second time in two months, a move that could be indicative of lower demand. Of course, it could theoretically also mean the company is changing things in the factory to build the new cars. We don’t know. Tesla hasn’t responded to a request for comment about the timeline for its affordable models.

“Investors won’t care about that. Everyone is focused on robotaxis.”

While Morningstar strategist Seth Goldstein says it’s looking more and more likely that Tesla is going to blow its first-half deadline, he does think lower-cost models will be produced sometime this year.

“Of course, every month the new vehicle launch is delayed makes it more likely that Tesla will see lower sales this year,” Goldstein said. Analyst consensus expects Tesla’s vehicle sales to drop for the second year in a row.

Tesla, meanwhile, has been wrapped up in its robotaxi launch, a technology the company sees as central to its future. And perhaps investors are, too.

“Investors won’t care about that,” CEO and founder of GLJ Research and Tesla bear Gordon Johnson told Sherwood News, referring to the once important low-cost models. “Everyone is focused on robotaxis.”

Indeed, Tesla’s stock popped yesterday on what was a mostly successful launch this weekend.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Tesla’s 45 Austin Robotaxis now have 14 crashes on the books since launching in June

Since launching in June 2025, Tesla’s 45 Austin Robotaxis have been involved in 14 crashes, per Electrek reporting citing National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data.

Electrek analysis found that the vehicles have traveled roughly 800,000 paid miles in that time period, amounting to a crash every 57,000 miles. According to the NHTSA, US drivers crash once every 500,000 miles on average.

The article says Tesla submitted five new crash reports in January of this year that happened in December and January. Electrek wrote:

“The new crashes include a collision with a fixed object at 17 mph while the vehicle was driving straight, a crash with a bus while the Tesla was stationary, a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.”

Tesla updated a previously reported crash that was originally filed as only having damaged property to include a passenger’s hospitalization.

Last month, Tesla shares climbed after CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X that the company’s Austin Robotaxis had begun operating without a safety monitor.

The article says Tesla submitted five new crash reports in January of this year that happened in December and January. Electrek wrote:

“The new crashes include a collision with a fixed object at 17 mph while the vehicle was driving straight, a crash with a bus while the Tesla was stationary, a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.”

Tesla updated a previously reported crash that was originally filed as only having damaged property to include a passenger’s hospitalization.

Last month, Tesla shares climbed after CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X that the company’s Austin Robotaxis had begun operating without a safety monitor.

tech
Jon Keegan

Ahead of IPO, Anthropic adds veteran executive and former Trump administration official to board

Anthropic is moving to put the pieces in place for a successful IPO this year.

Today, the company announced that Chris Liddel would join its board of directors.

Liddel is an seasoned executive who previously served as CFO for Microsoft, GM, and International Paper.

Liddel also comes with experience in government, having served as the deputy White House chief of staff during the first Trump administration.

Ties to the Trump world could be helpful for Anthropic as it pushes to enter the public market. Its reportedly not on the greatest terms with the current administration, as the startup has pushed back on using its Claude AI for surveillance applications.

Liddel is an seasoned executive who previously served as CFO for Microsoft, GM, and International Paper.

Liddel also comes with experience in government, having served as the deputy White House chief of staff during the first Trump administration.

Ties to the Trump world could be helpful for Anthropic as it pushes to enter the public market. Its reportedly not on the greatest terms with the current administration, as the startup has pushed back on using its Claude AI for surveillance applications.

tech
Rani Molla

Meta is bringing back facial recognition for its smart glasses

Meta is reviving its highly controversial facial recognition efforts, with plans to incorporate the tech into its smart glasses as soon as this year, The New York Times reports.

In 2021, around the time Facebook rebranded as Meta, the company shut down the facial recognition software it had used to tag people in photos, saying it needed to “find the right balance.”

Now, according to an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Meta seems to feel that it’s at least found the right moment, noting that the fraught and crowded political climate could allow the feature to attract less scrutiny.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads.

The tech, called “Name Tag” internally, would let smart glass wearers identify and surface information about people they see with the glasses by using Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

Now, according to an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Meta seems to feel that it’s at least found the right moment, noting that the fraught and crowded political climate could allow the feature to attract less scrutiny.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads.

The tech, called “Name Tag” internally, would let smart glass wearers identify and surface information about people they see with the glasses by using Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.