Tech
Tesla Light Show In Nanning
Tesla light show on December 29, 2025, in Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China (VCG/Getty Images)

Tesla stops selling self-driving technology as a one-off, pivoting to a subscription model amid slowing vehicle sales

Starting Valentine’s Day, Full Self-Driving will be subscription only.

“Tesla will stop selling FSD after Feb 14,” CEO Elon Musk announced in the wee hours of Wednesday morning. “FSD will only be available as a monthly subscription thereafter.”

The stock initially jumped on the news before sliding lower in early trading on Wednesday. The mixed reaction mirrors the announcement itself, which can be read in at least two very different ways, depending on how generous you want to be to Tesla and its Full Self-Driving technology.

The generous take: As FSD nears the ability for Teslas to actually drive themselves without human intervention, its value is going to skyrocket. Tesla will be able to charge much more per month as part of a handsome, high-margin recurring revenue stream, so it will no longer make sense for Tesla to sell one-off lifetime packages.

“The FSD price will continue to rise as the software gets closer to full self-driving capability with regulatory approval,” Musk said in 2020. At “that point, the value of FSD is probably somewhere in excess of $100,000.”

At current rates, Tesla owners can buy FSD for around $8,000 or pay $99 per month — quite a steal by Musk’s estimation.

Of course, from most accounts Tesla’s tech is not actually at the level of full self-driving. Take, for example, Tesla Robotaxis, which run a more advanced version of consumer FSD, but have missed the company’s own deadline to remove safety drivers from the front seats. In Austin, the fleet of roughly 30 Robotaxis has been involved in eight crashes since June, according to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The less generous take: Very few people were ever willing to shell out for FSD, and those who did were often left frustrated as Tesla repeatedly pushed the promise of true autonomous driving further into the future. That frustration is especially acute for owners of older Teslas, which may require hardware upgrades to run the latest versions of FSD.

So far only 12% of existing drivers pay for FSD — either through the one-off purchase or a subscription — the company reported in October. And Tesla already slashed the purchase price to $8,000 from $12,000 back in 2024, and halved the monthly subscription rate to $99 from $199. Note that in the 2020 quote, Musk is essentially admitting that Full Self-Driving doesn’t mean “full self-driving.”

In the past few years, Tesla’s revenue growth has largely come from energy generation and services, which includes FSD. In the third quarter of 2024, services revenue rose 25%, while automotive sales grew just 8% — and that was during a record delivery and revenue quarter. With fourth-quarter deliveries disappointing, those automotive numbers are likely to look even worse when Tesla reports earnings later this month, making predictable, high-margin subscription revenue all the more attractive.

More Tech

See all Tech
42

Forty-two is the answer to life, the universe, and everything in Douglas Adams’ classic “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.” It’s also the number of unsupervised Robotaxis Tesla has on the road in Texas, the only state where it’s operating autonomous service, according to records from a newly required government database in the state.

That’s much lower than CEO Elon Musk had hoped, as the company struggles to ready its camera-only autonomous vehicles for commercial scale. In 2025, Musk said that the service would be available to “half the population of the US by the end of the year.”

Even smaller competition has more: Avride has 317 and Nuro has 47. Meanwhile, Tesla’s chief rival, Alphabet subsidiary Waymo, has 577 in operation in the state. Nationwide, Waymo’s fleet currently numbers more than 3,000.

Unfortunately for Tesla, figuring out how to actually scale its robotaxi fleet remains the ultimate question.

INDIA-TECHNOLOGY-AI-DIPLOMACY

Anthropic raises $65 billion at a $965 billion valuation, releases a more “honest” Claude Opus 4.8

Anthropic’s monster $965 billion valuation puts it firmly ahead of OpenAI’s $850 billion valuation as the rivals head toward expected IPOs later this year.

tech
Jon Keegan

Report: Microsoft tries to get back in the AI coding game with new model

Microsoft wants to fight its way back into the AI coding field by releasing a new model next week at its annual Microsoft Build developer conference, The Information reports.

The company is expected to announce a new family of models as Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman seeks to shore up the company’s own AI offerings and gradually wean it off OpenAI’s technology over the remainder of their $13 billion partnership.

Microsoft was initially well positioned to meet software developers with AI-enhanced tools. It owns GitHub, the most popular platform for hosting and sharing code, and GitHub’s Copilot AI-powered coding tool was released months before OpenAI’s ChatGPT debuted in 2022.

But it fumbled one of the biggest first-mover advantages in history as Anthropic’s Claude Code, OpenAI’s Codex, and Cursor rolled out coding tools that developers loved.

Microsoft was initially well positioned to meet software developers with AI-enhanced tools. It owns GitHub, the most popular platform for hosting and sharing code, and GitHub’s Copilot AI-powered coding tool was released months before OpenAI’s ChatGPT debuted in 2022.

But it fumbled one of the biggest first-mover advantages in history as Anthropic’s Claude Code, OpenAI’s Codex, and Cursor rolled out coding tools that developers loved.

Ojai outside

Waymo to launch free robotaxi rides in its new Ojai vans

The new vehicles are less expensive — which is important for the service to really scale.

Rani Molla5/28/26
tech
Rani Molla

Report: Tesla’s Robotaxi trainers don’t think it’s ready for prime time

If you listen to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, you might think rapid expansion of the company’s Robotaxi service is right around the corner. If you listen to the people tasked with reviewing the footage and training its AI, that future is a long way off.

An in-depth report from Reuters that interviewed nine former “data labelers” and a former Tesla self-driving engineer paints a picture of highly massaged safety stats, vehicles failing to execute basic driving functions, and a behind-the-scenes reality where the supposedly “autonomous” tech relies heavily on the exact kind of localized, labor-intensive mapping and training Musk has publicly mocked. The skepticism runs so deep that one former insider told reporters they wouldn’t ride in a Robotaxi “if you f---ing paid me.”

Currently, the service is operating about 30 unsupervised vehicles across three Texas cities — a much more circumscribed execution than Musk had initially planned. The problem, for Tesla, is that the success of its Robotaxi business is now integral to the company’s value proposition.

An in-depth report from Reuters that interviewed nine former “data labelers” and a former Tesla self-driving engineer paints a picture of highly massaged safety stats, vehicles failing to execute basic driving functions, and a behind-the-scenes reality where the supposedly “autonomous” tech relies heavily on the exact kind of localized, labor-intensive mapping and training Musk has publicly mocked. The skepticism runs so deep that one former insider told reporters they wouldn’t ride in a Robotaxi “if you f---ing paid me.”

Currently, the service is operating about 30 unsupervised vehicles across three Texas cities — a much more circumscribed execution than Musk had initially planned. The problem, for Tesla, is that the success of its Robotaxi business is now integral to the company’s value proposition.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.