Business
Times Square, New York City: US flag designed on the United...
US flag in Times Square (Photo by Roberto Machado Noa/LightRocket via Getty Images)

These are the brands that divide America

Your dish soap and coffee can say a lot about your politics.

While a Trump presidency might be bad news for, say, Tesla, and while a Harris presidency might be good for Planned Parenthood, the vast majority of American brands have little real stake in the upcoming election. That said, most brands are certainly partisan, in the sense that their customer base leans notably liberal or conservative. And in turn, that’s an important bit of information for those companies.

Only 29% of brands are considered bipartisan, according to a new report by survey firm YouGov, meaning liberals and conservatives consider purchasing them at roughly equal rates, or within 10 percent of each other. (Note that YouGov only surveyed the 53.9% of Americans who consider themselves to be either liberal or conservative, while the 32.5% that said they were moderate and another 13.7% said they weren’t sure were not included in this study.)

“For most of these brands where their bottom line are revenue- and dollar-based, I think being nonpartisan is probably the goal,” Ryan Gmerick, VP of new business sales at YouGov, told Sherwood.

The aspiration may be to live up to Michael Jordan’s famous quip from 1990 – "Republicans buy sneakers, too” – but in practice, public perception doesn’t usually pan out this way. To paraphrase the libs, what is most interesting is our differences. YouGov ranked a bunch of brands by consumer category with the biggest gap between the share of liberals and conservatives who would consider purchasing them (not necessarily which brand each preferred the most).

The real gems are when seemingly benign consumer brands seem to have a huge partisan slant.

Liberals, for example, over-index on Target and Ikea for retail, while conservatives lean most stringently toward Hobby Lobby.

You’ve got your LaCroix liberals and A&W conservatives. Conservatives go in for Folgers coffee while liberals like Naked Juice.

Which soft drinks & beverages do Americans prefer?
YouGov

Conservatives were more likely to shop for Jimmy Dean by a 15 percentage point margin, while vegetarian meat brands Impossible Foods and Beyond Meat led with liberals by about 10 percentage points.

Liberals place a premium on Subarus, whereas conservatives opt for Fords.

Which car brands do Americans prefer?
YouGov

Conservatives are more likely to choose Dawn for their dishes, while liberals wash up after meals with the more environmentally conscious Seventh Generation.

Conservatives chow down on Cracker Barrel and Olive Garden, while liberals are more likely to eat out at California Pizza Kitchen and The Cheesecake Factory.

Which casual dining brands do Americans prefer?
YouGov

Google Docs, Reddit, and Instagram had a big advantage among the left, while X is preferred by the right.

Which snack brands do Americans prefer?
YouGov

Of course, a lot of this disparity can be chalked up to demographic differences among liberals — who are more likely to be younger, female and live in cities in the North or West — and conservatives — who are relatively older, male, rural, and live in the South.

“The drivers behind the differences are probably going to vary greatly depending on what the category is,” Gmerick said.

A store like Bass Pro Shops is going to be more popular among conservatives in rural areas where there’s more fishing and hunting, for example, while stores that are more common on the coasts, like Trader Joe’s, may be preferred among the majority liberals who live there.

Age also is a major factor.

“You have conservatives that tend to be older,” according to Gmerick. “I think that part of the story is that people are just kind of set in what they do after a certain period in their life. It's more difficult for a new brand to break through, no matter what the category is.”

Something like conservatives’ relative willingness to consider staying at Trump Hotels, however, is much more overtly political. (Liberals veered toward Airbnb.)

The biggest differences, of course, are in advocacy groups, with conservatives vastly preferring the NRA while liberals flocked most divergently to Planned Parenthood and the ACLU. The same goes for TV networks. I’ll let you guess who prefers Fox News and Newsmax to MSNBC and CNN.

And for some brands whose consumers lean one way or another, their difference is a selling point. That’s led some of those brands to take part in the culture wars, like Ben & Jerry’s (Ritz leans right) and Chic-fil-A (liberals prefer Starbucks and Chipotle). Bud Light, which ended up in conservative crosshairs because of an endorsement by a transgender influencer, is now favored by liberals, while Coors Light is preferred by conservatives.

A brand’s success can come down to how they spin this partisanship.

“For certain categories, certain brands, their products or what they sell isn't necessarily tailored to the general population,” Gmerick said. “They know their audience, they know who they want to go after, and so they can actually lean in to some of the ideology in their messaging to really cater to what they know their audience set wants.”

Of course, some brands manage to thread the political needle, though those are few and far between.

Here’s a look at the most bipartisan brands by sector:

Most bipartisan brands by sector
YouGov

Just 28 brands of nearly a thousand popular brands YouGov looked at had less than 1 percent difference in purchase consideration by political ideology, meaning there was virtually no difference in whether a liberal or conservative would consider purchasing them.

Those safest brands include Amazon, Maybelline, KFC, the very American-sounding American Eagle and Best Western, the organizer of the great American pastime, the MLB, and Neosporin, because if we’re pricked do we not all bleed?

Most bipartisan brands
YouGov

More Business

See all Business
business

The average price of a new vehicle in the US passed $50,000 for the first time ever in September

The average price of a new vehicle in the US surpassed $50,000 in September, according to Cox Automotive’s Kelley Blue Book.

At $50,080, that’s the highest industry average ever, reflecting the price hikes faced by new car buyers in recent years amid pandemic supply shortages, tariff-induced increases, and the high cost of EV production. The figure marks a 3.6% jump from the same month last year.

“Tariffs have introduced new cost pressure to the business, but the pricing story in September was mostly driven by the healthy mix of EVs and higher-end vehicles pushing the new-vehicle ATP into uncharted territory,” Cox executive analyst Erin Keating said. Passing the $50,000 mark was inevitable, Keating said, especially considering that the country’s bestseller is a Ford truck that “routinely costs north of $65,000.”

Year over year, new vehicle prices rose nearly 6% for GM, while Ford’s climbed 2.5%. Volkswagen new prices were up 12.5%.

As prices climb, so do delinquencies on loans to borrowers with lower credit scores. Recent data from Fitch Ratings shows the portion of subprime US auto loans 60 days or more overdue reached 6.43% in August.

business

Alibaba slides as the e-commerce giant’s cloud arm reportedly plans to slash overseas prices

Alibaba slipped more than 3% Tuesday morning following reports that its cloud unit will cut prices of select Elastic Compute Service products by up to 10.2% in overseas markets including Frankfurt, Tokyo, and Dubai.

The cuts, effective October 30, reflect the company’s push to expand its global footprint. The moves reflect a more targeted regional approach for the company as it seeks to strengthen its footprint in Europe and Asia. Alibaba Cloud made similar price cuts on international cloud products last year.

Competition is hot: Alibaba Cloud sits behind behemoths Amazon, Microsoft, and Google in the global cloud race, coming in fourth worldwide, according to data from Gartner.

business

GM dips after revealing it will take a $1.6 billion Q3 hit due to its EV pullback

A few weeks after the end of the $7,500 federal EV tax credit — and the end of General Motors’ attempt to extend itGM says slowing EV sales will cost it $1.6 billion in its third quarter.

“Following recent US Government policy changes, including the termination of certain consumer tax incentives for EV purchases and the reduction in the stringency of emissions regulations, we expect the adoption rate of EVs to slow. These developments have caused us to reassess our EV capacity and manufacturing footprint,” GM wrote in a Tuesday filing.

As a result, GM said, the company will take a $1.2 billion charge pegged to EV capacity adjustments. An additional $400 million cash hit will come from canceled EV contracts with suppliers. The automaker said it’s “reasonably possible” that it will incur more EV-related charges in the coming quarters.

GM reports its third-quarter earnings next week. In the first half of the year, rival Ford has posted losses to the tune of $2.18 billion related to its EV business.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.