Business
Man's Brain Powerplant
Man's brain power plant

The idiot’s guide to AI jargon

Don’t like politics at the Thanksgiving table? Here’s some performative AI jargon for you to weaponize so you can win the day.

Unless your entire family has been living under a rock — or you work for Apple, a company that continues to mostly ignore the trend — AI is going to come up at your Thanksgiving.

So, here’s a quick glossary of AI-adjacent vocab, each of which has gone modestly viral at the various peaks and troughs of the hype cycle this year, hopefully empowering you to seem artificially intelligent yourself, much like I am trying to do by writing this piece.

  • AI slop: We’ve all seen it by now, with our social media feeds clogged up with low-effort videos, images, and illustrations cooked up by AI models like Sora. The latest genre of awful to emerge from this hellscape of content is fake recipes, which have flooded the internet in the lead-up to Thanksgiving.

  • DeepSeek: There were two major market meltdowns this year. One was tariff-gate; the other was DeepSeek-gate, when the news broke at the end of January that Chinese researchers had replicated much of the performance of Western AI models at a fraction of the cost with DeepSeek — briefly blowing a $1 trillion hole in US stocks.

  • Vibe coding: I’m going to borrow straight from Replit’s blog: “Vibe coding refers to the practice of instructing AI agents to write code based on natural language prompts. It’s not about being lazy — it’s about focusing your time and energy on the creative aspects of app development rather than getting stuck in technical details.” In my opinion, it is about being lazy, as getting AI to do your work for you seems like the core of the appeal to me.

  • Agentic AI: A particular favorite of CEOs across America, the term refers to AI chatbots and models that are specifically empowered to take actions on their own, with minimal human oversight — i.e. they have agency.

  • Behind the meter: As we entered the back half of 2025, much of the discussion turned to how to power the AI revolution, with energy-sapping data centers requiring vast amounts of electricity, often in remote areas. Behind-the-meter solutions provide power on-site, putting less strain on the grid. Goldman Sachs sees BTM solutions such as on-site gas turbines and fuel cells as a key provider of electricity for the data center build-out.

  • ARC-AGI-2: A visual reasoning test that AI models often find very difficult. Other ways of testing AI chatbots include difficult math and physics questions, or running a fake vending machine business. Google’s Gemini 3 Pro scored the highest on ARC-AGI-2 of any model tested yet (according to Google, at least).

  • Synthetic data: AI models need lots of data to train on. They love text, images, video, and audio data. The problem is, we’re running out of actual data — so we’re now making up synthetic data to use.

  • Blackwell chips: If Nvidia is the biggest team in the AI game, then Blackwell is its star player, an AI chip that succeeded the previous Hopper architecture and turned NVDA briefly into a $5 trillion stock. It’s widely regarded as the best on the market, and it’s priced accordingly: each one costs $30,000 to $40,000 a pop. Nvidia can’t sell Blackwell chips in China — a sticking point of trade tensions this year and a source of frustration for the tech giant itself.

  • TPU: A tensor processing unit, often compared to a GPU (graphics processing units). The term has exploded in the last week because Google’s well-received Gemini 3 was “trained and powered on Google homegrown TPU chips,” suggesting Nvidia might have a little more competition in the AI chip space than previously thought. Read Luke Kawa’s excellent piece on what this might mean for both Alphabet and the wider ecosystem.

  • Jevons Paradox: A short-lived debate that ignited in the wake of the DeepSeek drama. The paradox, named after an English economist born in 1835, observes that making something cheaper or more efficient to use — and therefore implying we need less of it — actually typically leads to a rise in demand, not a drop. Which, in the case of AI, has been true so far.

  • Multimodal: An AI tool or model that can interpret multiple media such as text, images, video, etc.

  • Inference: What it’s all about. The ability for an AI to recognize patterns, interpret signals, or draw conclusions from data it hasn’t explicitly seen before. IBM has a longer definition here.

  • Tokens: The building blocks of AI’s output. As my colleague Jon Keegan concisely explains: a “token” is like an atomic unit of data. When text is input into a model, the words and sentences get broken down into these tokens for processing. In OpenAI’s case, one token is roughly four characters, and a paragraph is about 100 tokens.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.