Business
AI Robot and human cooperation connecting puzzle pieces together.
Getty Images
Generating Creativity

Which jobs are cramming AI into their résumé to stay relevant?

Rani Molla

The people most likely to be supplanted by generative AI have become its biggest boosters. Or at least that’s one way to read data from Microsoft’s 2024 Annual Work Trend Index.

In the past six months, non-technical professionals have increased their use of LinkedIn Learning courses designed to build AI aptitude by 160%, the report said. And the occupations most likely to have added AI skills like ChatGPT and Copilot to their LinkedIn profiles are in creative positions.

Some 33% of content writers who added skills to their profiles last year included AI, while 27% of graphic designers did so, according to the Microsoft report.

“Content writers are very interested in AI as a core new tool they need to know about, and are eager to showcase to potential employers that they are bringing that knowledge to their work,” LinkedIn Workforce Expert Aneesh Raman told Sherwood.

Perhaps it’s also because generative AI tools have proved to be scarily good at generating creative text and images, formerly the province of those very humans.

A study last year by the University of Pennsylvania and OpenAI, the makers of ChatGPT found that half of workers could have over 50% of their tasks exposed to large language models, like ChatGPT. Exposure was highest among some notably creative positions like designers and journalists. It didn’t say those jobs would necessarily be replaced by gen AI tools, but they would be altered.

Ritik Dholakia, managing partner of design firm Studio Rodrigo, which employs a number of graphic designers, said they’ve used a number of gen AI tools like OpenAI, Midjourney, and Dall-E to spark ideas and save time.

“These fields are seeing these emerging tools as anywhere from being a new fundamental toolkit we have to master to an existential threat to people's jobs,” Dholakia said. “I think there's a higher level of adoption, in that people need to become familiar with these tools because they don't know what their jobs are going to look like in three years, five years, seven years.”

Pete Pachal, a former journalist and founder of The Media Copilot, a newsletter and consultancy on how to use AI for content creation, sees creatives types familiarizing themselves with gen AI as a self-preservation mechanism.

“A lot of these softer-skilled professions, whether you're a copy editor or a copywriter, the way gen AI emerged it suddenly became very clear to everyone, ‘Oh, a lot of that work can now essentially be taken over by machines.”’

While he said that expectation has lost steam as gen AI’s limitations have become more clear, creative professionals now understand that they’ll at least have to work with these tools.

“People are realizing it's still here and it's going to be have a big impact,” Pachal said. “But I need to understand it and upskill myself, so that I can essentially stay relevant.” 

The Microsoft report found that three-quarters of knowledge workers are using AI at work, often without their bosses’ express permission.

The vast majority said it helps them save time and keep up with the volume of work, allowing them to focus on what they consider their most important work.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.