Business
An illustration of Two, 7-Eleven Slurpees
Two 7-Eleven Slurpees in front of a store (Tim Sloan/AFP via Getty Images)
Weird Money

The $58 billion Slurpee acquisition

Sure, 7-Eleven is more than gas and Slurpees, but it’s still an outrageous bid.

Jack Raines

Most of the bigger mergers and acquisitions stories that have made headlines over the last few years have been tech related, such as Nvidia attempting to acquire Arm Holdings, Big Tech companies “acquihiring” AI startups’ teams, or Adobe attempting to acquire Figma.

Occasionally, however, we get news of a potential blockbuster deal in the least-tech-focused of industries, like grocery stores, or, as of Wednesday… gas stations. Earlier this week, Reuters reported that Junro Ito, a member of the founding family of Japan’s Seven & i Holdings, the parent organization of 7-Eleven, had made an eye-watering $58 billion bid to take the company private. The reason? They’re trying to outbid Couche-Tard, the Canadian convenience-store operator and owner of Circle K.

Interestingly, this story comes the same day that the Financial Times reported that Seven & i and Couche-Tard had “begun negotiations” over a $47 billion takeover bid for the 7-Eleven store owner. The Financial Times piece also noted that any bid from Ito would likely require unprecedented levels of borrowing” from Japan’s banks to finance the deal.

A few things here:

First, $58 billion would be, by far, the largest management buyout in history if the deal closed. For context, Hilton Worldwide, one of the world’s largest hotel chains, is worth $62 billion. The largest management buyout on record was in 2006, when the founder of US hospital chain HCA worked with KKR and Bain Capital to acquire the company for $32.9 billion. The largest leveraged buyout of any kind was the $45 billion acquisition of Texas-based energy company TXU by KKR, TPG, and Goldman Sachs in 2007, and it ended in bankruptcy when the company failed to make interest payments during the recession. Even the lower bid from Couche-Tard would break records.

Second: $58 billion?! For 7-Eleven? I had no idea this company was that big, but Seven & i owns more than 85,000 stores across several brands, including 7-Eleven, Speedway, Japanese supermarket Ito-Yokado, Japanese ATM and online banking solution Seven Bank, Japan’s Denny’s franchises, and more. In total, the conglomerate generated $73.5 billion in 2023 revenue, adjusted for current exchange rates. Meanwhile, Couche-Tard, which owns Circle K, operates ~16,800 stores around the world, and its 2023 revenue was in line with its Japanese counterpart at $71.9 billion. So, to be fair, 7-Eleven is more than just a gas station.

My question, however, is whether or not the “white knight” bid from Junro Ito is real, or if the founding family is seeing just how high Couche-Tard is willing to go.

Alain Bouchard, Couche-Tard’s founder and executive chairman, has been gunning for 7-Eleven for decades. Bouchard first tried to acquire the company’s US business in 2005, but Seven & i declined. Nineteen years later, they could make history, creating a conglomerate with more than 100,000 stores worldwide (pending any regulator-mandated divestitures), and this move would give Couche-Tard a large footprint in Asia, where it only has 1% market share right now.

The question, however, is finding the right price.

There’s a scene in the final season of HBO’s “Succession” where Logan Roy is in a bidding war with his kids to acquire a competing media company. After he discovers that they beat him out by offering $10 billion, he calls them to say one of the best lines in TV history: “Congrats on saying the biggest number, you f---ing morons.”

I wouldn’t be totally surprised if there’s a similar game of chicken happening with these convenience-store chains right now. In August, Couche-Tard made an initial $38 billion offer for Seven & i, sending the latter’s stock price up 23% in response to the news. A month later, Seven & i rejected the offer, and Couche-Tard countered with a new $47 billion bid. While the Ito family could be willing to pay a $10 billion premium over Couche-Tard’s latest offer to retain control, they might also be willing to see if they can get the Canadian conglomerate to “say the biggest number” and pay a $20 billion premium over its initial bid.

More Business

See all Business
business

Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO and founder, was also an early Anthropic investor

A chess prodigy, and an actual a knight of the realm in the UK, it's perhaps no surprise that Demis Hassabis has made some strategic moves about his exposure to AI upside. According to people familiar with the matter, the influential AI architect became an angel investor in Anthropic, currently behind many of the leading AI models, per Arena AI leaderboards.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, according to the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spend $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

I'm playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by his DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, according to the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spend $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

I'm playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by his DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

business

Jury rules against Musk in lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman

Jurors in Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and OpenAI found the defendants not liable on all claims on Monday.

In a unanimous verdict reached after less than two hours of deliberation, the Oakland jury found that Musk had waited too long to bring his case forward, exceeding the statute of limitations.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.