Business

Take cover

Disaster, Inc.

The weather is bad but the profits are good

Abstract Storm
Getty Images

Natural disasters are making a mess of America. Private equity wants the cleanup cash

The global remediation industry is forecast to grow from $70 billion this year to $92 billion by 2029, and investors are clamoring to get a piece of it

Patrick Sisson

The $200 billion US disaster-restoration industry, which runs the gamut from mold-remediation services to fire-damage repair, has traditionally been run by small, local, independent businesses. It’s how the giants in the industry got started: New York-based Belfor USA bought into the industry when it acquired a small family company founded in 1946 as Quality Awnings & Construction, while cleanup titan Servpro began as an independent painting company in 1967 in Sacramento, California. 

Restoration businesses became private-equity targets with the successive disasters of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the financial crisis in 2008. Katrina demonstrated the scale and potential addressable market of modern disaster cleanup; two years later, the financial crisis nudged private equity into seeking out businesses with stable cash flows in fragmented industries. The restoration industry is an investor’s dream: it’s replete with mom-and-pop operators who are guaranteed business by the ever-increasing stream of natural disasters. 

“This industry is recession-proof and keeps growing,” said JT Kraai, CEO and founder of Exit Strategies 360, which brokers merger-and-acquisition deals between private equity and restoration and remediation firms.

Restoration businesses became private-equity targets with the successive disasters of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the financial crisis in 2008.

To such investors, hurricanes are not just a disaster but also an opportunity. Post-storm remediation (removing below-the-surface issues like mold or water damage) and reconstruction (repairing walls, replacing carpets, fixing roofs) have attracted growing financing. The cadence of storms like Hurricane Helene, whose “biblical devastation” last week caused up to $5 billion in commercial-property damage, and Hurricane Milton, which has wreaked havoc across Florida, is why the global-remediation industry is forecast to grow from $70 billion this year to $92 billion by 2029

With the uptick in powerful hurricanes, mold remediation alone is now a billion-dollar business. American homes have become more, not less, likely to grow mold. The widespread switch from plaster to drywall during the post-World War II homebuilding boom gave toxic black mold a petri dish for growth — panels of gypsum sandwiched between two layers of paper offer a better place to incubate than stone and brick — and in the ’70s, the push for energy efficiency and sealing homes meant less air exchange, only making it easier for mold to bloom. Stories of mold toxicity abound, like that of Melinda Ballard, whose Texas mansion became riddled with spores that made her family sick and spawned a multimillion-dollar lawsuit. That and other instances raised awareness of the dangers of mold, and the industry flourished. 

Today’s weather patterns will only accelerate this growth. Within 24 hours, waterlogged homes can grow enough fungi to cause coughing, watery eyes, and itchy throats. After Katrina, 46% of homes showed mold contamination. Unlike the sizable home-repair and maintenance industry, there’s not a lot of do-it-yourself enthusiasm for breaking down a waterlogged ranch home. Done by experts, a typical mold-remediation job can cost upwards of $3,000, and the cost of clearing an entire house can go up to $30,000. And private equity is taking notice: Threshold Brands, launched by private-equity firm Riverside, purchased the Pennsylvania-based Mold Medics franchise last year and aims for expansion across the continental US. Tim Swackhammer, the former CEO of Mold Medics, told the Franchise Times that the brand’s original store did $1.45 million in revenue in 2022, a 200% increase from 2018, the year it opened. 

Even four years ago, the remediation industry was less consolidated. Last year’s mild winter meant there was a down year for profits, which pulled down valuations and owners’ willingness to sell. Winter is the industry’s busiest season, and fewer cold days meant fewer burst pipes, a common service request, and fewer storms to send tree limbs through windows. But with 2024 shaping up to be busy on the disaster-recovery front — on top of the deadly hurricanes, a colder winter is being predicted — that will likely change. Already this year, a number of investments, like Point 41 Capital Partners’ acquisition of Georgia Water & Fire and Summit Partners’ investment in remediation company Insurcomm, are being discussed as ways to “enter a new and expanded era of growth.”

The global-remediation industry is forecast to grow from $70 billion this year to $92 billion by 2029. 

Many private-equity-owned groups have grown considerably in just the past four years as roll-ups continue. Take Belfor, owned by private-equity firm American Securities. By 2018, the company was making $1.95 billion in revenues, and since then it’s acquired more than a half-dozen other large firms. From late 2020 to this past April, ATI Restoration acquired 15 companies. AEA Investors’ Blackmon Mooring bought 11 companies in the last 4.5 years. BluSky picked up 10 smaller firms between 2021 and 2023 alone and now does business in 40 states. Blackstone owns a majority share in Servpro, an industry giant that’s played a role after many of the nation’s more recent high-profile disasters.

A majority of the nation’s restoration firms make between $1 million and $10 million in revenue annually doing what’s called large-loss work — like fixing a library whose roof collapsed from heavy snow accumulation. The industry’s big names have what are called “cat divisions,” for catastrophes, that deal with FEMA. This can be a high-risk, high-stakes game because federal reimbursement can take years. Right now, any company east of the Mississippi with this kind of division is focused on Helene and Milton, and as long as you have the capital reserves to wait to be repaid, it can be very lucrative. After Hurricane Ian, in 2022, FEMA paid nearly $4 billion via the National Flood Insurance Program to repair homes and businesses.

Profits jump during hurricanes, Belfor CEO Sheldon Yellen told Forbes, but repayment delays can anger temporary hires — he said he’s been punched by a carpenter and threatened at gunpoint by a drywall installer over late payments. But there are challenges to increased consolidation, especially when it concerns firms and their valuations. Getting one big year’s worth of profit from a hurricane may convince an owner they’re worth more, but investors might not look at it that way, seeking to instead average out annual profits. 

Large-scale disaster cleanups have been found to leave their own messes in the wake of natural disasters, ranging from exploitation to injury to death. Resilience Force, a group that advocates on behalf of the disaster-restoration workforce, said that this kind of work is dominated by immigrants, currently and formerly incarcerated people, and US-born people of color. The work can be dangerous and struggled with wage theft in the past. The group’s report last year, “Private Equity Profits from Disaster,” found 194 OSHA violations from private-equity-owned restoration companies between 2015 and 2022.

Large-scale disaster cleanups have been found to leave their own messes in the wake of natural disasters, ranging from exploitation to injury to death.

And, of course, there’s the elephant in the room that often goes unmentioned in presentations about how disaster cleanup is a highly profitable growth sector: the climate crisis. “A lot has been coming out for decades about the effects and impacts of climate change, and how that will only grow,” said Azani Creeks, a senior researcher and campaign manager for the Private Equity Stakeholder Project. “Even though private-equity firms and other large companies might pretend like they can still continue investing in fossil fuels with no damage, they know that this climate disaster is ramping up and is coming, as evidenced by the way they’re investing in these remediation companies.”


Patrick Sisson is a reporter covering cities, businesses, and technology.

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.