Business
Sweetgreen Q1

The economics of a Sweetgreen salad

Greener linings

Shares in salad seller Sweetgreen jumped a whopping 34% on Friday, after the company beat Wall Street’s expectations, as revenues rose 26% year-on-year to hit $158M in the first quarter.

That makes Sweetgreen — popular for peddling premium salads that can cost as much as $20 — one of the best performing stocks in America this year, having soared more than 185% in 2024.

Sweetgreen shares

Raw deal

Investors were buoyed by the company raising both its revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance for the rest of 2024. However, despite selling more salads than ever before in Q1, Sweetgreen still isn’t profitable... which may come as a shock to anyone who’s paid $15-20 for a salad and left feeling like they could have made it themselves for a fraction of the price.

By indexing Sweetgreen’s earnings to $15 — roughly the price of a typical salad at the chain — it’s easy to see exactly where the leafy costs are coming from. In fact, for every $15 of revenue in Q1, the company incurred operating expenses of more than $17.50.

Sweetgreen Q1

Interestingly, the cost of the actual food, drinks, and packaging is only a fraction (about $4.15 out of $15 in our example) of the final sale price. Labor costs take another $4.35 bite out of the earnings, and then rent, property costs, and other expenses swallow $3.78. Those total costs tally just over $12 — great! Sweetgreen’s restaurant operations, in isolation, are very profitable for a food service business… but, of course, there are overheads to consider. Those overheads take Sweetgreen well into the red.

Over the hot summer months, Sweetgreen is likely to sell more salads (who doesn’t love a light lunch when it’s hot?), which might finally get the premium salad chain’s bottom line into the black. Other things that might help the rest of this year? Robots and steak.

Beefing up

Last year, Sweetgreen began deploying robots in the kitchen to mix salads, dispense ingredients, and take orders. Indeed, its first automated location opened in Illinois last May, following rivals in the quick-serve sector that were already tinkering with automated stores. That’s good for the “labor” part of Sweetgreen’s costs on the chart above… and less good for employment prospects. In fact, the two locations that are automated, which Sweetgreen calls its “Infinite Kitchens”, posted profit margins (at the restaurant level) of 28%... some 10% higher than all of the others, per QSR.

The other innovation is more recent: Sweetgreen has started selling a number of steak-heavy salads. Those have quickly become best-sellers in initial testing, according to the company, although they jar with the company’s very public push to be sustainable.

More Business

See all Business
business
Tom Jones

Demis Hassabis, Google DeepMind’s CEO and founder, was also an early Anthropic investor

A chess prodigy and an actual a knight of the realm in the UK, it’s perhaps no surprise that Demis Hassabis has made some strategic moves about his exposure to AI upside. According to people familiar with the matter, the influential AI architect became an angel investor in Anthropic, currently behind many of the leading AI models, per Arena AI leaderboards.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, per the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spending $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

Im playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as a recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

The Nobel Prize winner’s position in the Claude creator was previously undisclosed and, per the Financial Times, highlights Hassabis’ “growing influence across the AI industry.”

Google, which bought DeepMind, the company that Hassabis cofounded and heads to this day, for a reported ~$400 million in 2014, is also a key Anthropic investor. The tech giant reportedly plans to invest up to $40 billion in the AI company as part of the mutually beneficial relationship the pair have forged, with reports that Anthropic has committed to spending $200 billion in the other direction on Google’s cloud services over the next five years.

Im playing all sides, so I always come out on top

In addition to his financial support for Anthropic, Hassabis has also invested in a range of AI startups launched by colleagues, such as Inflection AI, a company set up by DeepMind cofounder Mustafa Suleyman (who is now CEO of Microsoft AI), as well as efforts from other collaborators, like David Silver’s Ineffable Intelligence.

Hassabis also emerged as a recurring figure on the fringes of the recent Elon Musk v. Sam Altman trial, cropping up repeatedly in testimonies and court documents and appearing to live, as The Verge put it, “rent-free” in Musk’s head.

Founded in 2021, Anthropic has recently raised funding at a reported $900 billion valuation, sending it soaring ahead of competitor OpenAI.

business

Jury rules against Musk in lawsuit against OpenAI and Altman

Jurors in Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawsuit against Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and OpenAI found the defendants not liable on all claims on Monday.

In a unanimous verdict reached after less than two hours of deliberation, the Oakland jury found that Musk had waited too long to bring his case forward, exceeding the statute of limitations.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Musk had alleged that OpenAI abandoned its founding mission as a nonprofit dedicated to developing AI for humanity and instead became a profit-driven company closely tied to Microsoft.

The verdict caps off a three-week blockbuster tech trial that could have seen Altman and Brockman removed from OpenAI leadership.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.