Markets
27th SCAD Savannah Film Festival - Portraits
James Carville, who famously quipped, “It’s the economy, stupid!” (Emma McIntyre/Getty Images)

Is it really just the earnings, stupid?*

*in which “stupid” is a reference to the author.

Luke Kawa

The major bounce-back in US stocks that started with tariff relief has received a welcome fundamental boost during this reporting period.

Ahead of Q1 results, I hypothesized that this earnings season wouldn’t really be about earnings. It would be about tariffs: whether companies saw a rush of activity from customers trying to beat the imposition of levies and how their outlooks had changed in light of the upheaval to trade — if they deigned to even offer an outlook at all.

Q1 results, in other words, had the potential to be a bit of a head-fake about a world that was no longer going to exist.

And, well, there is some support for that thesis. Companies that do well aren’t seeing their stocks soar, by and large, perhaps because of that aforementioned line of thinking or because the solid results came along with underwhelming guidance.

“Companies which have beaten on both EPS and sales have outperformed the S&P 500 by 0.2ppt the following day, well below the historical average of 1.5ppt — suggesting 1Q results matter less amid looming uncertainty over tariffs/the macro and the potential impact on the rest of the year,” wrote Savita Subramanian, head of US equity and quantitative strategy at Bank of America. “Misses have underperformed by 3.9ppt the subsequent day, more than the historical average of 2.5ppt.”

Q1 results, in other words, had the potential to be a bit of a head-fake about a world that was no longer going to exist.

But that may be missing the forest for the trees here when it comes to telling another simple story about earnings season: it’s been really good!

In aggregate, earnings have surprised to the upside by a colossal amount.

So far, profits per share have exceeded expectations by a whopping 9.3% among S&P 500 companies that have reported, per Bloomberg data.

That’s the best in at least the past couple years, and contrasts wildly with what analysts had been doing in a frenzied fashion ahead of earnings season: chopping estimates more often than they had since Covid.

Sales, it should be noted, are exceeding expectations by much less than earnings. What this tells us is that companies were great at managing margins (yet again!), maximizing their earnings for every dollar of sales. This may become a challenge in the event that tariffs push input costs materially higher.

But markets are always (supposedly) forward-looking. And what they seem to be looking forward to is a world where tariffs aren’t as high as traders would have feared a few short weeks ago, they might be going down even more, and Corporate America is in a much better starting position than previously thought to grapple with whatever awaits.

On the other hand, the fact that the S&P 500’s best performer since the April 8 lows by a considerable margin is Palantir — a company driven more by retail enthusiasm than staid reevaluations of the discounted value of its projected future cash flows — does seem to severely undercut purely fundamental-based explanations to unpack the market move. As does the stronger recovery for the iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF compared to baskets of the most tariff-affected stocks.

Oh well, we tried.

More Markets

See all Markets
markets

Lucid cuts 12% of its US workforce in a profitability push

EV maker Lucid announced on Friday it is laying off 12% of its US workforce as part of its efforts to improve profitability.

This is Lucid’s third round of layoffs since March 2023. At the end of 2024, the company said it had 6,800 employees globally.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

“This difficult but necessary decision was made to improve operational effectiveness and optimize our resources as we continue on our path toward profitability,” interim CEO Marc Winterhoff told employees in an email published by Business Insider. The company has been without a permanent CEO since February 2025.

Lucid has worked to boost its cash reserves in recent months. Late last year it announced plans to raise $875 million through a private offering of convertible senior notes due in 2031.

markets

The Supreme Court’s tariff ruling isn’t sweeping relief for automakers, but it isn’t nothing either

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a significant chunk of President Trump’s tariffs, but the decision isn’t a cause for automakers to fully exhale.

Friday’s ruling relates to tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and not Section 232. The 25% tariffs on automobiles and auto parts were imposed under Section 232, so those tariffs remain in place.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

Still, it’s worth noting that automakers including Ford, GM, and Stellantis aren’t completely on the outside looking in. IEEPA tariffs did cover certain machinery, lower-cost raw materials, and components, which account for a small chunk of automaker production costs.

According to the Center for Automotive Research, IEEPA tariffs account for about $250 per vehicle for the big three Detroit automakers, or $902 million in costs. That’s a far cry from the Section 232 tariff impact of $4,240 per vehicle, per the think tank, but it’s not nothing.

The modest bump in auto stocks compared to retailers on Friday reflects the light relief.

markets

Nvidia nears $30 billion investment in OpenAI’s funding round, the FT reports

Nvidia is close to investing $30 billion in OpenAI as part of its long-discussed funding round, per the Financial Times.

Bloomberg had previously reported that Nvidia would be investing $20 billion in this round.

The FT says that this investment will effectively be replacing a bigger planned pact between the two companies. The Wall Street Journal had originally reported in late January that Nvidia’s investment of up to $100 billion in OpenAI, which was announced in September, had “stalled” amid private criticisms of the ChatGPT maker by CEO Jensen Huang.

As Microsoft, SoftBank, or Oracle could tell you, being viewed as overly exposed to OpenAI has not been a boon for stocks in recent months.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.