Tech
Tesla Cybercab
This Tesla Cybercab won’t be the car self-driving passengers see around Austin in June (Sjoerd van der Wal/Getty Images)

What we now know about Tesla’s Austin robotaxi launch this year

It’s expected “end of June or July” and “in many other cities in the US by the end of this year.”

Despite its tumultuous quarter, Tesla says it’s on track for its robotaxi launch in Austin this year. That means regular people will be able to pay money to ride in a self-driving fleet of Tesla-owned vehicles beginning in the “end of June or July,” CEO Elon Musk said on the company’s earnings call, where he offered a few more details about the project.

Earlier this year Musk had said June, but in the scheme of his timelines, July seems close enough. Back in 2019, Musk said the company would roll out a fleet of robotaxis “next year,” i.e., in 2020.

Musk now says the service will be available “in many other cities in the US by the end of this year.”

As with everything Tesla, take any promises and timelines with a grain of salt. Here’s what else we now know about Tesla’s robotaxi launch, according to Musk:

  • The robotaxis are Model Ys, not Cybercabs. The vehicles consumers will be able to hail in Austin will be autonomous Model Ys, Musk said, but added that any of the “vast majority of the Tesla fleet” is capable of being a robotaxi, including models S, 3, X, or Y. The two-seat steering-wheel-less gold Cybercab that Musk trotted out last fall is still scheduled for production in 2026.

  • The service will have “10 to 20 vehicles” at its start. “We’re still debating the exact number to start up on day 1, but it’s, I don’t know, maybe 10 or 20 vehicles on day 1,” Musk said. He added that the company plans to “scale it up rapidly after that” and that “there will be millions of Teslas operating autonomously in the second half of next year.” That’s around the same time Musk expects the program to “become material and affect the bottom line of the company.”

  • It’s happening in Austin. While that might seem like an obvious point, having a ride-hailing service within a sunny, geofenced area where it’s been training for months is not the same as having unsupervised full self-driving in the wild across the US. Despite this, Musk said what the company is “solving for is a general solution to autonomy, not a city-specific solution for autonomy,” and that it would be a “very scalable thing for us to go broadly within whatever jurisdiction allows us to operate.”

  • The cars will have remote operators. “We do have remote support, but it’s not going to be required for safe operation,” Musk said, downplaying the need for remote operators. “Every now and then if a car gets stuck or something, someone will like, unlock it.”

  • Testing for autonomous full self-driving in Austin seems to be doing pretty well. Musk says the electric vehicle company is working through “unusual” edge case interventions. “These are really very rare, like a single intervention every 10,000 miles,” Musk said, adding that the company is burning lots of rubber to come across those in Austin. “There’s just always a convoy of Teslas going just going all over to Austin in circles.”

  • Unsupervised FSD coming to your personal vehicle “before the end of this year.” Musk sees the transition from unsupervised full self-driving robotaxis to unsupervised full self-driving personal vehicles as an easy one, sharing that the cars are already driving themselves from the factory to the parking lots. We’d like to point out that that is not the same thing. The routes Tesla vehicles drive autonomously outside the factories are previously mapped, low-traffic, and short: 1.4 miles for the Model Y and 0.6 miles mostly in an underground tunnel for the Cybertruck in Texas.

  • Musk thinks Tesla will trump Waymo. Despite the fact that Google-owned Waymo is already operating a self-driving ride-hailing service in Austin (and a few other cities), Musk estimates Tesla will have at least a “90-something percent” market share. “I dont see anyone being able to compete with Tesla at present,” Musk said, adding that Waymo’s lidar-equipped cars are too few and too expensive. He also made a pretty good dad joke: “The issue with Waymos cars is it costs way-mo money.”

When pressed for more details about the robotaxi rollout, Musk demurred.

“Its only a couple of months away, so you can just see it for yourself in a couple of months in Austin,” he said.

More Tech

See all Tech
tech

Tesla’s 45 Austin Robotaxis now have 14 crashes on the books since launching in June

Since launching in June 2025, Tesla’s 45 Austin Robotaxis have been involved in 14 crashes, per Electrek reporting citing National Highway Traffic Safety Administration data.

Electrek analysis found that the vehicles have traveled roughly 800,000 paid miles in that time period, amounting to a crash every 57,000 miles. According to the NHTSA, US drivers crash once every 500,000 miles on average.

The article says Tesla submitted five new crash reports in January of this year that happened in December and January. Electrek wrote:

“The new crashes include a collision with a fixed object at 17 mph while the vehicle was driving straight, a crash with a bus while the Tesla was stationary, a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.”

Tesla updated a previously reported crash that was originally filed as only having damaged property to include a passenger’s hospitalization.

Last month, Tesla shares climbed after CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X that the company’s Austin Robotaxis had begun operating without a safety monitor.

The article says Tesla submitted five new crash reports in January of this year that happened in December and January. Electrek wrote:

“The new crashes include a collision with a fixed object at 17 mph while the vehicle was driving straight, a crash with a bus while the Tesla was stationary, a collision with a heavy truck at 4 mph, and two separate incidents where the Tesla backed into objects, one into a pole or tree at 1 mph and another into a fixed object at 2 mph.”

Tesla updated a previously reported crash that was originally filed as only having damaged property to include a passenger’s hospitalization.

Last month, Tesla shares climbed after CEO Elon Musk said in a post on X that the company’s Austin Robotaxis had begun operating without a safety monitor.

tech
Jon Keegan

Ahead of IPO, Anthropic adds veteran executive and former Trump administration official to board

Anthropic is moving to put the pieces in place for a successful IPO this year.

Today, the company announced that Chris Liddel would join its board of directors.

Liddel is an seasoned executive who previously served as CFO for Microsoft, GM, and International Paper.

Liddel also comes with experience in government, having served as the deputy White House chief of staff during the first Trump administration.

Ties to the Trump world could be helpful for Anthropic as it pushes to enter the public market. Its reportedly not on the greatest terms with the current administration, as the startup has pushed back on using its Claude AI for surveillance applications.

Liddel is an seasoned executive who previously served as CFO for Microsoft, GM, and International Paper.

Liddel also comes with experience in government, having served as the deputy White House chief of staff during the first Trump administration.

Ties to the Trump world could be helpful for Anthropic as it pushes to enter the public market. Its reportedly not on the greatest terms with the current administration, as the startup has pushed back on using its Claude AI for surveillance applications.

tech
Rani Molla

Meta is bringing back facial recognition for its smart glasses

Meta is reviving its highly controversial facial recognition efforts, with plans to incorporate the tech into its smart glasses as soon as this year, The New York Times reports.

In 2021, around the time Facebook rebranded as Meta, the company shut down the facial recognition software it had used to tag people in photos, saying it needed to “find the right balance.”

Now, according to an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Meta seems to feel that it’s at least found the right moment, noting that the fraught and crowded political climate could allow the feature to attract less scrutiny.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads.

The tech, called “Name Tag” internally, would let smart glass wearers identify and surface information about people they see with the glasses by using Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

Now, according to an internal memo reviewed by the Times, Meta seems to feel that it’s at least found the right moment, noting that the fraught and crowded political climate could allow the feature to attract less scrutiny.

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns,” the document reads.

The tech, called “Name Tag” internally, would let smart glass wearers identify and surface information about people they see with the glasses by using Meta’s artificial intelligence assistant.

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC produces fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and is a fully owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, or Robinhood Money, LLC.