Business
Google’s logo.
(Photo Illustration by Jaque Silva/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Wall Street is starting to ask CEOs when their AI spending binge will actually make money

Sundar Pichai got peppered on AI ROI during Alphabet’s earnings call. Similar questions will probably come up for other tech giants.

J. Edward Moreno

Analysts who cover Alphabet, the parent company of Google and Youtube, used to ask about artificial intelligence with curiosity. Now they want to see results. 

Sundar Pichai, Alphabet’s chief executive, spent much of his energy on a Tuesday earnings call assuring analysts that AI is driving new growth. Large tech companies started an AI investment blitz over the past few years, which has riled up investors. Alphabet alone has invested more than $12 billion in AI. 

The tone among analysts has shifted from previous quarters (we went back through Alphabet’s prior earnings calls). That pivot underscores growing concerns on Wall Street that the massive amount of money that has been invested on AI may not translate to more profits soon enough.

Alphabet, which reports earnings before some of its other AI-exposed peers like Microsoft, got an early taste of what will likely be a running theme in big tech earnings calls moving forward.

Ross Sandler, an analyst at Barclays, said on Alphabet's earnings call that it looks like AI may be going from an “underbuilt situation” last year to “potentially being overbuilt next year” if the rate of investment in AI keeps up.

“How are we thinking about the return on invested capital with this AI capex cycle?” he asked.

Pichai responded by saying the risk of missing out on the benefits of investing in AI outweigh the risk that they may be investing too much. 

“The one way I think about it is when you go through a curve like this, the risk of underinvesting is dramatically greater than the risk of overinvesting for us here, even in scenarios where if it turns out that we are overinvesting, we clearly – these are infrastructure which are widely useful for us,” he said.

Brian Nowak, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, pressed about adoption of Google’s AI capabilities. “We're sort of 18 months into this fever pitch around generative AI focus in the world,” he said. 

In a later note to investors, Morgan Stanley said “it will be important to monitor user adoption and incremental engagement/monetization from these new offerings to help investors better understand” the return on investment from AI investments.

Doug Anmuth with JPMorgan asked about Google’s AI Overviews, the answer summaries featured in search results, and whether it has more monetization potential than its traditional search. (The summaries have been known to sometimes get things wrong.

Analysts at UBS noted that Google search revenue is up, which means “shareholders are receiving an innovation-driven step-up in monetization” for that section of the business. It’s harder to tell if its Google Cloud Platform has benefited from those investments. 

“So as far as we are concerned, the [return on invested capital] debate remains only partially resolved,” they said. 

More Business

See all Business
business

The Trump administration is reportedly planning a 50% made-in-America requirement for USMCA tariff relief

Qualifying for USMCA-related lower tariffs may soon require more US-made vehicle components, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.

The Trump administration is reportedly planning to introduce a 50% US content requirement for vehicles covered by the trade pact to receive lower tariffs. The content would be measured by cost, according to the WSJ.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

There currently isn’t any US-specific requirement for those lower tariff rates, but in order to receive preferential tariffs, vehicles are must contain at least 75% regional content (components made in North America). Per Reuters reporting, the Trump admin is seeking to raise the regional requirement to 82%.

These reported plans are subject to change as the US negotiates USMCA terms with Mexico over the next few months.

Overall, Tesla will likely have the easiest time qualifying for any stricter requirements. The automaker’s vehicles contained the highest amount of US/Canadian content in 2025, according to American University research. Ford, GM, and Stellantis all scored lower.

Notably: the underlying government data that many domestic content measurements rely on intentionally combines US and Canadian components, so it’s difficult to know exactly how much of any given vehicle is specifically US-made.

business
Tom Jones

The $640,000 Luce makes the average Ferrari look like a bargain

Put aside the shape; put aside the smoothing out of Ferrari’s iconic sharp edges; put aside, even, the calls from former Chairman and President Luca Cordero di Montezemolo to “take the Prancing Horse off.” On the grounds of price alone, Luce detractors might have a point.

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

By now, many of us will have read the criticisms of Ferrari’s first fully electric vehicle, as the Luce — which was unveiled to the world earlier this week and promptly saw the company’s shares crash out in New York and Milan — gets subtly shaded by competitors online and not-so-subtly shaded by basically everyone else.

What makes all of this worse for Ferrari is that, even by the luxury car maker’s notoriously high standards, they’ve slapped a pretty hefty price tag on the Luce, and the company’s CEO, Benedetto Vigna, has already been forced to defend the €550,000 ($640,000) price point, saying yesterday that it’s “fair to pay for innovation,” per Reuters.

While Ferrari’s cars have been getting more expensive of late, as recently as 2022, Ferrari’s average revenue per car sold was around $340,000. At nearly twice that price, this new electric model is obviously proving a little much (visually, conceptually, and financially) for many loyal and long-standing fans of the Prancing Horse to stomach.

Ferrari Luce cost chart
Sherwood News

Latest Stories

Sherwood Media, LLC and Chartr Limited produce fresh and unique perspectives on topical financial news and are fully owned subsidiaries of Robinhood Markets, Inc., and any views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of any other Robinhood affiliate, including Robinhood Markets, Inc., Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC, Robinhood Crypto, LLC, Robinhood Money, LLC, Robinhood U.K. Ltd, Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Gold, LLC, Robinhood Asset Management, LLC, Robinhood Credit, Inc., Robinhood Ventures DE, LLC and, where applicable, its managed investment vehicles.